Aldo @Aldo2@gameliberty.club

@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net

I'm not blaming them for thoughts.

I do, however, take issue with those who act on it.

For me, consent is important.

@beardalaxy @bajax @Soy_Magnus

lol he shares my post, and then calls someone from detroitcity to come and what, try to get their gang of ingrates to pile on me like weeks ago from Luke's post?

And apparently he's the one being sarcastic?

Lol

Yeah, sure, he sarcastically tagged the guy in and brought up detroit-ers....Sarcastically....

Lol

@bajax @Soy_Magnus @beardalaxy

Do you not see the "/s" at the bottom of my comment?

Do you not know what that stands for?

I'll help you out.

It stands for "sarcasm".

@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net

I think that goes into BDSM shit, which I'm not experienced with haha

Are there "safewords" like "pineapple!"?

I think many times a rape is non-violent because the victim just wants it over with. It's a psychological response.

@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net

I think he's more correct than incorrect.

Nobody's perfect.

@bajax @beardalaxy

I would clearly go out and kidnap and sexually assault a child, obviously...

/s

@beardalaxy

You're trying to gatekeep an attraction, which never works.

@bajax @beardalaxy

> Legalizing loli doesn't prevent pedos
> It increases offense
> It doesn't actually, based on data

And you're saying you're "consistent"?

Are you reading what you're writing?

@beardalaxy making something illegal actually tends to motivate people who are already committing crimes to do more crimes, because they're already committing crimes.

Aren't you familiar with the "war on drugs"?

My point was that decriminalizing lolicon (at the very least) could help prevent people from "gateway"-ing into real life abuse by not making them think they're a criminal from the start.

You know, like the argument for weed legalisation.

@bajax @beardalaxy

Lol

> It doesn't prevent
> It does
> It's unrelated

Make up your mind...

@beardalaxy you've done this before, where you think that because they say indecent photos that means real children, even though the last time it was AI/lolicon as well.

Newsflash, Beard, the U.K. government literally does not distinguish between the two.

Lolicon is CSAM, according to their own definition. It was most likely 242 lolicon images, you know, the stuff you jack it too.

@beardalaxy I think it's important to point out that lolicon is banned in the U.K. (where this case occured) as CSAM, so, ironically, if it was legalized/decriminalized, then maybe this person wouldn't have done what they did...

@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net the way things are heading, yeah, I'd say so.

It will probably start small but then get bigger and bigger (like 1 and 2), so people won't notice until their cities are being bombed.

Stars are aligning...

@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net

Obviously, I'm against actual violent physical rape, non-consensual abuse, unwanted sexual assault etc...

I've suffered sexual assault myself (not as a child, but as an adult), and it's not pleasant. 10/10 would not do again.

I have my issues with "biastophiles", although it largely depends on the way they argue their position.

I've evolved from my earlier knee-jerk reaction.

I can understand the ones who say "it's just a kink/attraction, I'm not going to act on it", but there are others who unironically say "I haven't done it yet" or "I want to do it" etc... and those ones glow in the dark, if you catch my drift...

In general, I think "rape culture" is a more-so "adult" issue. And I think the reason it's that way is, again, due to restrictions on how "sexual" people can be when they are younger (i.e. when they are kids/teenagers).

@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net I have a hunch some of my friends know, but they're quiet about it or they haven't challenged me on it yet. And why should they, it's not like I've raped a child in front of them haha

@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net plus, them being public would lessen the stigma, which would allow other lower-class (i.e. non-elite) MAPs to "come out".

Everyone wins.

It just requires actual sacrifice.

Nothing good in this world ever comes for free.

@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net yeah that's what I meant. If they do so, or voice any pro-MAP position, they should be public about it.

Ordinary MAPs who, let's be honest, live in fear, don't have a cushion to fall on if they are public, but celebs/politicians/fmr. intelligence officials do.

It'd be like a test of their sincerity.

@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net

I'm on the side of ultra-caution, but I'm not a "leader" haha.

I reckon most would accept them, but they have to be heavily vetted and ideally they'd be public about their positions (they're the ones in the best position to do so, even in spite of blowback).

I have a dream...

@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net

Keep MAP-related politics haha

But only MAP-related politics. Nothing else.