He just like me fr....he just like me fr
https://youtu.be/4NaQRyc6BkI
@Nanashi @7 @11112011 @laurel @p @coyote @rats @Moon And yet that last line isn't quite right either to me, because it is never love that spawns wicked actions, it is always jealousy, or fear that gets mixed in with the pool thus corrupting it. And so again it seems to me love is incapable of being evil.
@Nanashi @7 @11112011 @laurel @p @coyote @rats @Moon I thought since you said motherly love is evil you meant that their experience was evil, but I see now you meant their actions were evil, actions you claim spawn from the feeling, rendering the feeling itself evil. I disagree that the feeling itself is evil, but I understand well that wicked actions can spawn from feelings of love.
@Nanashi @7 @11112011 @laurel @p @coyote @rats @Moon You're talking about loves mechanical properties but that does not fulfil the experience of having felt love. I am in agreement with your assessment of the logical mechanisms which playout within the engine of the sports car we call love, but knowing how it works and riding in it are two different things.
I’m a free speech absolutist because, as far as speech goes, I hate everybody, but, as far as actions go, I’ve always tried to be a good person and help everyone.
People who claim that there must be «no tolerance for the intolerant» usually ignore this divide between actions and words, probably because, in their own minds, it does not exist.
In any case, if everyone was tolerant, or if we only tolerated those who were also tolerant, how could tolerance be a virtue? Being good only to those who are good to you does not make you a good person. Virtue has value only when it’s faced against its opposite.
@mer I thought it was some weird old name for what I assumed was cherry syrup T-T
The Trench