YZZAJ @Jazzy_Butts@gameliberty.club
- Status
- Ascended
The Trench
Joined Nov 2021
I wish I could trust people again, hopefully I'm healed enough to do that soon, it only took 7 fucking years
Nvm it's shitting itself
There's just something about a person so fucking stupid that they think their accomplishments are A) their own and B) something to be lauded, they truly fail to realize that the accomplishment is for THEM, that if they only feel something when someone else ACKNOWLEDGES the accomplishment, then it was all just a facade, and was not genuine, and is therefore not admirable, unless you're admiring a fake for what a fake it is
I wish I came from a family that wasn't a bunch of fucked up lying pieces of trash, I bet I'd be much happier if I had an honorable and sincere family instead of a bunch of neurotic, panicky, unactualized, lemmings.
YZZAJ
boosted
@Fullycaffeinated @theblessing @angryandignored I'm generally nice to people when they're not pieces of shit btw, so if you want to side with team shitbird, the shithawk of shitfuck retard mountain, be my guest, and I'll call you a cunt too.
@Fullycaffeinated @theblessing @angryandignored She called me an asshole, first interaction, wonderful people you lot
@angryandignored @theblessing You're a cunt but you make good points, yet you completely ignore the fact that those children were not prole children, they were not wildmen chileren, they were chileren grown in tubes, like all the other upper class members, because they were upper class children. And so I'm still right, and not quite as retarded as I appear.
YZZAJ
boosted
Maggats still crying about the vote being stolen? Libtards are snowflakes but these reds are frosty the snowman 💀
YZZAJ
boosted
:labrys-45-sickle: 
it's incredibly weird to me how often I've seen the take about admins being able to read people's DMs on fedi being a bad thing, but like, how the fuck is this not a huge improvement to corporate social media "platforms" where they not only can read your DMs, but also track everything you do on the apps (fedi doesn't do this and making it happen while also being able to track people at scale would be really difficult), but not only that... social media platforms are INCENTIVIZED to track you and violate your privacy
YZZAJ
boosted
@AbNormal @itzpaquet @rats If baby jesus wanted us to think of them as people, he wouldn't have let them commit the crimes they dun got caught fer, an iffin they aint do em furreal anyway, wellun they did summin, baby jesus doan lai-yuh
@theblessing 1984 is about the experience of a low caste member in a dystopia, bnw is about the experience of a high caste member. High cast members get to go to the feelies, the orgies, they get to have soma, they have relative freedom. The proles in 1984 get jack shit, they get the two minutes hate and gruel and barely any cigarettes and have to make a razor last long past it's point of usability. The proles do not get to have feelies, and orgies, and soma, no, the proles get to have disgusting old rotten whores with painted faces to trick you until you get real close, close enough to smell em.
@doorroo @theblessing I like F451 because it offers hope, it says, "Yes things are bad, they are fucked, but you can get across the river and escape still"
@sekuhara @mario @bitterblossom @doorroo Your idea is much simpler and heuristic, I prefer it. I forget that bureaucracy isn't a part of the environment, it is a practice, I usually try and twist this system into something functional rather than abolish it, because of this forgetfulness. But it is more than forgetfulness, it is fear, there is a fear in me that if bureaucracy was ever collapsed, everything everywhere will die. And yet I consciously hate bureaucracy, I find it wasteful of time and energy and resources, but it's like an addiction, It's like a comfort, It's sick. Bureaucracy is like the Little drummer boy and when I march along with him I feel oh so in step, and oh so at ease, and yet in the back of my mind there is something scratching, screaming to get out because it knows that we are trapped.
@doorroo @mario @bitterblossom See this is a valid point, I'm open to ideas but they have to be thought out and logical, not doctrine
YZZAJ
boosted
@mario @Jazzy_Butts @bitterblossom Adults always make informed decisions, never get taken advantage of, and are, of course, never wrong about anything ever.
@doorroo @mario @bitterblossom This is a valid point that I have considered myself and is why I believe everyone should be restricted from giving consent from infancy onward, and it will only be when they are able to pass a series of tests to prove they aren't emptyheadded. Some will pass the tests at an early age, single digits for some, most will pass as teens, and another smaller percentage would pass much older, or maybe even never.
YZZAJ
boosted
@bitterblossom @mario @Jazzy_Butts
(continuing here bc l.t is bugging out on me too much)
consent choice is a simple positive or negative. that doesn't require a description, that's where the concept of informed consent comes in. which, clearly, an infant is not going to be able to provide (unless you got some freak genius baby on hand, which is a whole other mess of concerns).
the only reason children can't make informed consent decisions is because the adults refuse to fucking educate them properly. contemporary society forces children to be ignorant of many things, especially sexual ones, for no good reason - and then uses that abuse to justify overbearing protections "because they don't know better".
and despite it being the legal guardian's legal duty to protect a child from being taken advantage of, it's almost always the legal guardian who provides that sort of abuse, because the child has no means or rights with which to escape or prevent such abuse. nor is there any substantial system in place to check things and ensure that abuse isn't taking place - not until it's too late. AFTER a child starts showing the signs of being hurt, publicly, then MAYBE some other authority figure willl bother to contact legal authorities, and then they MIGHT bother to show up to investigate, and even when they do, chances are they don't do anything at all, because it's too bothersome for them to interfere and too expensive for the state to put more kids into protective custody.
informed consent required the subject to:
- actually be informed. if you don't allow a child to learn about love, sex, babies, etc, then you have failed them; they aren't inherently incapable of learning the information.
- make a decision based on that information and their own desires. it may be a positive or negative result. that is their decision to make, not yours, not anyone else's. you certainly don't get to say they don't have the right to make a decision in the first place.
the duty of a legal guardian comes into play when these conditions are not met. when the child is not yet capable of receiving, understanding, and communicating a choice of consent - then the parent would have the right to a decision on their behalf, PRESUMABLY for the child's benefit.
and this applies to mentally impaired adults as well as children. not everybody operates at the same level. age is literally not a factor, except that there's a bell curve of functionality, where the youngest edge of the spectrum is uneducated and unable to process complex information, and the eldest edge of the spectrum has gone senile and crippled and has lost necessary faculties. that middle section where one is perfectly capable of deciding things for one's self does not arbitrarily begin at 18+ years old. it would be far more accurate to say it begins around two years old, spikes around 4, and then rapidly accelerates as a child absorbs information from formal schooling.
(continuing here bc l.t is bugging out on me too much)
consent choice is a simple positive or negative. that doesn't require a description, that's where the concept of informed consent comes in. which, clearly, an infant is not going to be able to provide (unless you got some freak genius baby on hand, which is a whole other mess of concerns).
the only reason children can't make informed consent decisions is because the adults refuse to fucking educate them properly. contemporary society forces children to be ignorant of many things, especially sexual ones, for no good reason - and then uses that abuse to justify overbearing protections "because they don't know better".
and despite it being the legal guardian's legal duty to protect a child from being taken advantage of, it's almost always the legal guardian who provides that sort of abuse, because the child has no means or rights with which to escape or prevent such abuse. nor is there any substantial system in place to check things and ensure that abuse isn't taking place - not until it's too late. AFTER a child starts showing the signs of being hurt, publicly, then MAYBE some other authority figure willl bother to contact legal authorities, and then they MIGHT bother to show up to investigate, and even when they do, chances are they don't do anything at all, because it's too bothersome for them to interfere and too expensive for the state to put more kids into protective custody.
informed consent required the subject to:
- actually be informed. if you don't allow a child to learn about love, sex, babies, etc, then you have failed them; they aren't inherently incapable of learning the information.
- make a decision based on that information and their own desires. it may be a positive or negative result. that is their decision to make, not yours, not anyone else's. you certainly don't get to say they don't have the right to make a decision in the first place.
the duty of a legal guardian comes into play when these conditions are not met. when the child is not yet capable of receiving, understanding, and communicating a choice of consent - then the parent would have the right to a decision on their behalf, PRESUMABLY for the child's benefit.
and this applies to mentally impaired adults as well as children. not everybody operates at the same level. age is literally not a factor, except that there's a bell curve of functionality, where the youngest edge of the spectrum is uneducated and unable to process complex information, and the eldest edge of the spectrum has gone senile and crippled and has lost necessary faculties. that middle section where one is perfectly capable of deciding things for one's self does not arbitrarily begin at 18+ years old. it would be far more accurate to say it begins around two years old, spikes around 4, and then rapidly accelerates as a child absorbs information from formal schooling.
@sekuhara @mario @bitterblossom Thankyou, seriously, because I did not have the fucking energy
- Status
- Ascended
The Trench
Joined Nov 2021
