Follow

You can complain about the modern art all you want... But I still guess it beats all the "stone collection parks" we have.

Yes, I get that statues are expensive, and slides for kids need maintenance, but is this really the best we can do? Or, am I missing the usefulness for kiddies, who can play on stones?

@LukeAlmighty I'd rather have those rocks than modern art tbh. Those rocks have no subversive intent behind them.
I'd rather see giant rocks than the abomination they replaced the melted-down statue of Robert Lee with.
Rocks are good decoration anyway; the Japanese have been building rock gardens for several centuries.
NIGGA YOU WANNA LICK SOME WHITE BOY BOOTS YOU DO DAT SHEEIT BUT WE NIGGAS OUT HERE ON DUH NICE CREW AIN'T DAT WAY WE PROUD BLACK FEDIVERSIANS YALL KNOW WHAT I'M SAYIN' :frieren_cry:

@LukeAlmighty Anything nature made, including a large border, usually looks better than modern art. I'll occasionally go on a mountain trip to basically just see glorified boulders. :peepoShrug:
But seeing that this is a park, a kids playground, grass and trees, should have taken priority over the boulders. Personally, I would have planted a tree in the center, and then some flowers and grass, instead of THAT.

@LukeAlmighty I think it's nice to have rocks there if you're making a natural kind of landscape, but that park definitely needs more greenery.

@LukeAlmighty they're good for decoration but I wouldn't call them art. Two different concepts imo.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.