Show newer

@PonyPanda @Salastil @EmmaFaber
Not her personally... :ablobcool:

I am an analytic person, so when I see a problem, I need to understand it.. fully.

So, obviously I would love a debate with some radfem to figure out, how can they get to the point, when they learn to not see all of the man's instincts to care about women. It's not like it's the single strongest male instinct or anything...

@PonyPanda @Salastil @EmmaFaber
I am quite pissed about the whole thing, since I would love to understand her, but it seems, she's too immersed in the grandiose illusion of a righteous fight, that I will never get to the core assumptions in her arguments.

@PonyPanda @Salastil @EmmaFaber
Thanks for an explanation...

I was seriously confused by that one aswell.

@Salastil

What struck me right away about Emma is that I never saw anything uniquely "radfem" about her. I tried to get her on a question about male pathological behaviour being rooted in our biology which runs counter to "gender critical radical feminism" and she just ducked the whole question and went off on another Reddit-spacing rant about men wanting to rape. I don't know if I've ever seen them address the tranny question either which stands out a lot to me because trannies are the recent phenomenon that's come to define modern day radfems. I think I'm the only person outside of spinster who refers to them as radfems and not "TERFs" because that's what everyone knows them as. The feminists that hate trannies going into their bathrooms. Emma seems to be a second wave feminist stuck in the past.

From that, I think it's one of three things...

1. Emma is a boomer and she's retarded from post-menopausal estrogen deficiency causing her brain to rot
2. Emma is a shill that read one "for beginners" book on feminism that was published decades ago
3. Emma is a bot that was programmed with equally outdated information

If it's any of the latter two, possibilities, the question is why? Why would somebody post this shit or program a bot to.

I have some theories on that but... they're too prematurely formed for me to want to talk about them.

@EmmaFaber
@Salastil
You see them saying "listen up women" as odd or cringeworthy but radfems are legit like this. I've seen them unironically talk like this IRL and it's just a reflection of standard leftist group engagement.

You've probably seen videos of political street conflict where some dumb, well meaning Trump supporter is trying to debate antifa/leftists on their own terms in good faith? Then the leftist would just repeat a chant appealing to the crowd that has nothing to do with his inquiry?

They're not trying to pass themselves off as women so much as they're just playing to the crowd. It's more because they want the reddit updoots. It might very well be that this account is a Redditor here because they killed the radfem subreddit.

But you are right about them posting more to appeal to the spinsters than meaningfully engage with us.

@EmmaFaber
Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.