@Economic_Hitman @unabomber @matrix @jeffcliff
I'm not too bumbed about it.
On the other hand, I am seriously afraid about effects of anti-depresants and anti-conceptions on society.
While most technologies enhance our options, these two destroyed social rules... and that is a jump I am not sure we even can solve.
@Economic_Hitman @matrix @jeffcliff
I get it.
Face recognition and nukes are two examples we are seriously not ready to handle...
@Economic_Hitman @matrix @jeffcliff
Now, you got me surprised.
I get the point, but still. Most people have no idea how does a car work. Yet they do trust it. Almost noone knows how the calculator works,
At some point, a human brain ends, and we have to make a choice. Either we develop something new, or there will be no way to go further.
I am not even saying, that it has to make all of the decisions for now, but let's be honest. There is no adwisor in the world, that can study and understand terabites of data in life. AI can do it in days. And worse?
Computers got to the stage when they are faster then we are funking 50 years ago. At this point, it's inexcusable to not use these technologies in my opinion.
BTW, have you ever seen some of the cutting edge physics research? No human can understand the whole, and I cannot understand ANY part. Yet, I am willing to trust the results are better then anything I could ever do. Why would AI be different at this?
@Economic_Hitman @matrix @jeffcliff
So... do you agree with me or him though?
(sorry, I don't get your comment, but am interested in your opinion)
You have lost connection to the server
@mangeurdenuage
The guy on the right should het a rise for this scene...
@Economic_Hitman @matrix @jeffcliff
On the other hand, the same teacher did explain to me why is arteficial inteligence growing slower then it should.
His poinion went something like:
Yeah... neuron networks might be doing a literal miracles right now, but peope do not see inside them that is why ontology (what I teach) is better...
Bruh... that is the point...
We want to create a decision monolyth that will be making decisions so complex, we won't be able to understand them. That is the entire point. If humans were to understand every single part of the decision, we can program a dumb state machine to do the job... ![]()
@VD15
This cannot be real...
>>>Satire account<<<
Fascism:
When you don't let people abuse your kids.
LukeAlmighty DO NOT have any pronouns. You can only refer to LukeAlmighty by LukeAlmighty's name. Please, be tolerant of this.
Please be patient, LukeAlmighty have autism
Never forget #metoo
🇨🇿
I you are in Czech republic, DM me, I'll be happy to grab a beer with you
>>>Satire account<<<