Show newer

@freemo @NEETzsche @SirHendrick
Who are you even trying to persuade here? Your arguments are nothing but insults and appeals to your own authority, but why do you think you claiming to be smart would be enough to change opinions?

@freemo >We care about what works, not what people who have no understanding of science think of the system.

Apparently you do think what genpop thinks of the system because you’re trying to get genpop to act on its findings, freaking out in the news media and in government when they blow those findings off. Like I said, academic scientists lost a lot of credibility in the last decade and your hoity toity appeal to your own authority won’t save you from that loss of credibility. In fact, it contributes to it.

t. someone who did published research in a university

@SirHendrick @LukeAlmighty

@Melon @matana @matrix
Yes.
The test isn't about if she believes you can pay it back. Women do spend money on many men who never will.

The test is to see if she sees you as a person worth investing 5kč into. Simple as that.

@matrix @LukeAlmighty @matana its an investment, you support a man with upcoming prospects then profit in the future. That's what I WOULD say if women didn't choose weed addicted bums on the regular

@Terry
Never let yourself get arrested.
Once you enter that car, your life belongs to the state.

@NEETzsche @SirHendrick @freemo
Peer reviews are the main reason, why the more educated population is loosing any trust in scientific community.

For the rest of population, we have Fauci.

@freemo The way you do science is you make an educated guess (hypothesis), you test it in some way (experimentation), and then you update your views based on the outcome of your experiment. The peer review step is extraneous and is basically just there as part of a step to convince other people that you’re not full of shit.

Unfortunately for academic scientists, this peer review system isn’t inspiring a lot of confidence in the general population.

@SirHendrick

@matrix rather, it's
misogynist man: replies seriously to her remarks, wiling to discuss them like a fellow adult (reality: man isn't sold on her pants, is willing to offend her. ex.: Roosh V concluding that he'd rather argue with Norwegian women than fuck them.)
the man she wants: immediately agrees with her remarks (reality: man is focused on grinding relationship points to get in her pants, doesn't care what she's saying)

She's filtering for something but it isn't what she thinks it is.
@matrix Maybe it's just because of grug brain, but I can't see this going any way other than painfully awkward. Like you're having a pleasant conversation and she keeps complimenting random women instead of asking about you or telling you her own stories or god forbid letting you tell her about yourself
@matrix @matana she also proves she was just begging for a compliment HERSELF. The speaker expects someone to hear her story of her strong sister, yet compliment the speaker for literally doing nothing? Lmao."she's lucky to have you".
No one fucking talks like that. The woman writing that is so conceited, bitter, and has so little self confidence that she makes even another "sister's" story about herself.

You can't make this shit up, from their own accounts. A walking stereotype of the man-hating, attention & affirmation-seeking woman :cirno_laugh:

@matana @matrix
Well, would you mind providing a racional example then? I know some great personality tests myself, but obviously, if you provide a test like "I said a logical contradiction, and he pointed it out", sorry I do not see it as anything but yet another drama generator.

For example, here is a good personality test. Go for a coffee, and pretend, you are one or two coins short. A woman, who wouldn't be willing to give you that little is not a woman, you can live with...

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.