Show newer

Just went to an Asian restaurant
Got served by 2 kids
The older one had to be about 6.
They were both professional, and didn't do any mistake.

They even served the cash machine.

They had a blast acting like adults and being treated with respect back.

Yet, according to czech law, they are some filthy criminals, becaise they aren't old enough to do, what I just saw them do without any issue. Fucking ridiculous.

@Jens_Rasmussen @xue @LukeAlmighty @NEETzsche

“Non-scientific” is the ONLY correct way to use EQ, and to a lesser extent, IQ.

But try telling that to the office bimbos of the world.

“I’m very good with people, and it’s easy to understand and be understood. I just have a naturally high EQ!”

…Says the woman with the big boobs.

But try telling her that people only like her for her appearance, and not because she actually brings anything of value to the company table, and you’ll instantly get a sense for what her real “EQ” is, regardless of whatever retarded test she took.

@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
And yes, the one on the right is "good with people".

Good enough actually to make her a millionare without working.

@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
> "social skills"
These two women ask you to do a task for them. Do you think it's "social skills" that will make the difference?

>"Men have higher IQ, but women have higher EQ, and EQ is actually more important in a business setting where forming connections is critical!"

🥒 😋

@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
OK lightbulb.

Will the scenario of "being critisized" play differently if you're attractive?

Do you have more reason's to "be positive", when everyone is suspiciously kind to you?

These are the questions from the test. I am sorry, this is not an empathy test. And neither is it a self-awareness test.

It is "how many people are trying to make my life easy in hope to get in my pants" test.

@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
If you want to debate about the ability for empathy, I could agree there.

But EQ has nothing to do with it. Equating EQ to empathy is the same as equating feminism to equal rights. These terms are so masaquered by common understanding, that using them in some "specialized meaning" is pointless.

@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
Wow...
You missed the point of my oversymplification really hard.

Of course, my point was actually about the male empathy gab, but that topic is too advanced for now.

@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
Except it's fake. It is measured by self report of how well can you maintain relationships. If EQ was real, and actually did exist in women as described, divorce courts would not exist.

@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
If you take a look for example at "self made man", Nora Vincent was going to a date disguised as a man. She brutally failed as expected, but as soon, as she said, that she had booba, women were more interested in actually dating her.

EVEN WOMEN CARE ABOUT BOOBA!!!!

@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
Ok, let me explain it this way.
If you have booba, every conversation you have begins with goal of the opposite party to be as likable as possible.
If you don't have booba, this expectation is reversed.

So, there is no "social skill" actually needed on the side of the woman (relatively speaking) to get desired result.

It is as if you were comparing selling stuff to giving away money. The skill required to complete task is in a completelly different reality.

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.