LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

@r000t @matrix
I think you missed my point.
Yes, it is a valid "risk lowering" strategy.

My point was just about the legends around it.

@ThatCrazyDude @moffintosh @Vox
Can you?

@r000t @matrix
I know.
My point is only, that you cannot get over 1 ROI no matter, how good your strategy is.

But many people do believe, that if they count just right....

@ThatCrazyDude @moffintosh @Vox
Good luck with all the hard thinking then.
I hope that one day, you will also be able to apply basic logic to all or nothing hypotheticals.

@ThatCrazyDude @moffintosh @Vox
Oh, you're right.
I was the one who added the ending to your amazingly complex scenario.

@ThatCrazyDude @moffintosh @Vox
Good. Because for a moment, I thought, that your absolutely brilliant moment of clear thought was:

If everyone including cops and soldiers were ready to kill politicians on spot.... Politicians would die

@ThatCrazyDude @moffintosh @Vox
> no single cop nor a military commander with like 5 working neurons would even consider the possibility they can win.

Win what? A lottery? A war? A tic tac toe?

@ThatCrazyDude @moffintosh @Vox
> noagendasocial
Oh, I get it now.

@matrix
Card counting is a myth spread by casinos in order to make you believe, that you can out-brain the odds. You can't.

@ThatCrazyDude @moffintosh @Vox
No, your initial premise includes open armed revolution.
Your initial premise is not about taxes.

@ThatCrazyDude @moffintosh @Vox
So, you are no longer talking about taxes.

@moffintosh @Vox @ThatCrazyDude
That kind of a scenario is pointless.
If it would include cops and army refusing to enforce, then the inevitable death of politicians would cause much more.

If it didn't include the breakdown of enforcement, then people would start paying after a few examples being set.

And if politicians were still protected, and cops refused to enforce only taxes, then politicians would cover everything in inflation alone.