LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

@CreamSeparatist@neckbeard.xyz @ChristiJunior @folk @kekservative @p @s

Well, it is usually a good practice to define your definitions as wide as possible, since when you don't do so, you will always miss the greater picture. But since your entire argument is to redefine words until you get the EXACT result you want, there is point to debate.

BTW, nice try stealing SJW strategies.

@lain Why do I have a strange feeling that was not obviously photoshoped???

@kekservative @ChristiJunior @folk @p @s @CreamSeparatist@neckbeard.xyz

I hate it when you meet a guy with the "right opinion" and have to see him argue it so bad.

"Right is a rule that if broken can cause an agressive retaliation"

That is my definition. The important, becuse with the women rights example, there is no pars saying that is has to be the woman who retaliates...

All they need is to look sad and you have 10 simps ready to fight for their lady. So yeah, the fight will and had happened. It just wasn't women who fought.

@newt@niu.moe

How is it that people are able to write > 200 pages of pure information void??? What is that ability, and how is a person even supposed to read something like that?

I just don't get it. Our language is formed to such an amazing shape that it allows to describe the most complex thoughts in few sentences. Unless they know 200 pages of pure info, there is no fucking reason to waste so much.

And to be honest, 200 pages of properly written text would take decade to decypher properly.

Hi. Could you please help me get a "Government approved ID" of a tv series character? It seems that I somehow cannot delete my blizzard account without it :D

@dielan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpTycWYX6No