@Aether
I can fix 3 of them, but I seriously don't think anyone can fix Revy.
@beardalaxy
Exactly. They are just empty balls of sugar with no substance or flare.
@tomie
Meanwhile, I have to fucking learn an entierly new Danmei vocabulary now...
Fuck you China, you're only winning, because the rest of the world ain't playing.
@applejack
I will not have it, because you keep switching between the common core being rigid (what I claim) and abstract (what the article claims.)
@applejack
I did.
I said, that it is a rigid set of long systems, that postpone childern's understanding and ability to abstract mathematical problems.
@applejack
And other articles say, that feminism is a movement for equal rights between men and women.
@applejack
> The old-school way millennial parents were taught involved putting one on top of the other and carrying, if necessary. Now, students are encouraged to rethink how they arrange the numbers.
This particular sentence is what makes me pretty sure we don't agree though.
@applejack
If that was your point, then sure.
But that was not what I was complaining about.
@applejack
> I'm saying 8 + 2 + 6 is better than 8 + 6 + 2 and (41 - 1) + (29 + 1) is better than 41 + 29
I am not stupid enough to even try disagreeing with that.
@applejack
Teaching to make 10s was never connected to common core, and as a proof should be sufficient, that we both use that system. It is intuitive, and was always thought.
@applejack
No, we do not agree on even the premise. You say, that teaching the understanding of numbers is the point of common core.
Meanwhile, I say, that the point of common core is total systematization to the point, where a deeper understanding cannot be gained.
@applejack
> This is the right way to solve any kind of problem
See? Here comes the problem. We were tought, that the simplification of the issue is importand, and that as long as you can orient yourself around the issue, you are golden.
That is the exact oposite though of this. This is a rigid system made to be as robotic as counting individual dots. No understanding can be gained from that.
@applejack
And sorry, but I am unironically triggered by kids having to draw 13 dots, and adults looking at it thinking, that it's giving them a deeper understanding of the number 13.
>>>Satire account<<<
Fascism:
When you don't let people abuse your kids.
LukeAlmighty DO NOT have any pronouns. You can only refer to LukeAlmighty by LukeAlmighty's name. Please, be tolerant of this.
Please be patient, LukeAlmighty have autism
🇨🇿
I you are in Czech republic, DM me, I'll be happy to grab a beer with you
>>>Satire account<<<