LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

One of the hardest facts about a diet is, that every single diet ends with "one exception" that "doesn't kill the diet, right?"

So, you have to be a total performative diva about it. Because holding to it otherwise is just impossible.

* Report spam
> would you like to go to their website, and beg them for mercy and stop sending you spam?

No!!! They had their chance before they sent that shit to me in the first place.

@lks
True, but tightening screws does make some cars run better for a decade.

Either way, take care of yourself.

I am a man. A nice girl with pecks will always be an insanely strong debuff to my brain power. But how can people seriously ignore this special case is beyond me.

Annie did NOT redeem herself. I cannot accept any possible argumentation for that, since she did not even change her pattern of behavior in the slightest.

Her original goal was to capture/kill the founding titan. Simple goal, that she believed was good, only because she was told to do it. Nothing more. She is a psychopathic mass murderer. And everyone knew that. Including the fans.

So, let's skip several years, and what did she do? Well, she was told to go and kill/capture the founding titan. WHAT A REDEMPTION ARC

Still hot as fuck though 😭
Ok... Sorry, I got lost in my thoughts for a moment. They even made fun of the same concept in the first Ant-man, where it was directly said, that his redemption arc will be the same act, that got him into prison before. BUT:
They did so by acknowledging, that Antman's original act was in fact not evil to begin with. There is no such explanation for this killer.

@openalt TEĎ mi @marcel_kolaja psal osobně, že to nemá s evropskou unií nic společného.

Tak jsem z toho dost zmatený.

@EvolLove @Honkers
That's the funny part.
I would argue no, but this graph makes any of my arguments against it meaningless.

She just defeated all of my feminist logic in a single stroke of apathy.

@sickburnbro
Obviously, but every online debate is a public demonstration of your principles.

And also a good brain trainer.

@sickburnbro
Yes... But the critique isn't "they are trading the same dollar", since each transaction is adding value for both parties in each of them.

People need to be precise in their critique. even though, the original post was retardeded to begin with, so it's easy to miss the economic mistake among the 100 semantic ones.

@sickburnbro
Their math is correct.

No... The real issue isn't that circulation creates value. It is in the 0th step of:

Where did you get the 1 dollar you give? If you took it, then the taxed person won't buy the stuff he really needed in the first place. And if you print it, then you stole from everyone, and they won't be able to buy stuff thanks to price increase.

That is the issue. The "you give a dollar" cannot happen without "you take a dollar" before it.

@sickburnbro
Nah....
I support the anti-feminist part a lot more.

@lks
Time to start getting fit really fast.

@Gran3Walder
Wait...
Is this supposed to be an anti-Trump post?

@Goalkeeper @ChristiJunior @ElDeadKennedy
Still a step in the right direction though, don't you think?

goooooooOOOOOOOOD MORNING EVERYONE!!! 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

I had to seriously double check today, but the record is in at 99.1