Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀 @alyx@gameliberty.club

@igelsQTs @matrix
But that would leave her pregnant! And a fetus in her womb is literally violating her! (literal argument I've heard certain atheists repeatedly make).

I've seen children with better reading comprehension.

@EverySingleTIme @dave
You need a triple take it seems. He talked about a low level of norfentanyl, a metabolite of fentanyl. That's something that is created in your body, as it tries to process fentanyl. But if fentanyl OD kills you quickly, there won't be much time for norfentanyl to develop. Hence a death from fentanyl overdose would leave a low amount of norfentanyl in your body.

Of course, the argument easily falls like this: he took fentanyl much earlier in the day, the norfentanyl had time to accumulate in his body, the police catch him, he ingests whatever drugs he still had on him so the cops don't find it, this sends his body into OD.

@matrix
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: neo-nazis aren't real nazis. They're larper shit heads at best. Anyone trying to use neo-nazis to stir up fear of Nazi Germany 2.0 is a big fat liar.

The only one who will bring back The Reich to it's full glory is Igel-senpai. Heil! /s

@matrix @igelsQTs
Accurate description of atheism. You really can't make any other supposition about them other then a disbelief in gods, because as a whole (as a community if you will) they really aren't consistent about anything else. Recent years have made it pretty clear to me that they're not even consistent about opposing religious thinking. They just mostly oppose the religious thinking that they got brought up with.
You even see some flinch and stumble when you point out that they're defending Islam, because on one hand they should hate it for being an Abrahamic religion, but at the same time the woke religion tells them they must defend the muslims. Atheists are as flawed and prone to irrational thinking as anyone else.

As for the libertarian/authoritarian thing, they'll rightly attack the authoritarian imposition of Christianity, but then they fail no notice their own increasing authoritarian imposition on Christians. So any intersection with Libertarians is purely coincidental.

@furgar
This meme needs a picture of a retarded/handicapped child with MacOS.

@galena
Yeah, @p explained it to me once. It's inherently flawed and hell threads are it's biggest nightmare.

@igelsQTs @matrix
Yup, she's there.

@matrix
I don't see a Hinata in there. Time to prosecute Japan over it's war crimes.

P.S. I get that you guys are butthurt, but please stop stalking my timeline. Thanks!

"I'm not gonna show you proof that the claims of persecution of Jews during the entire history of Europe are Jewish lies, but I'm just gonna state it like a fact, and use that supposed fact to totally argue that the holocaust didn't happen".
If you wanna say that every account of discrimination & persecution of the Jewish people in Europe, before Hitler's reign, were lies spread by the Jews, that's your problem, cause now you have to prove that they were all lies. Good luck, cause you can't even prove that the holocaust was a lie. You're just using your claims of previous Jewish lies as a crutch to say "well if Jews lied that much, it must obviously conclude that they're lying about the holocaust too".

@beardalaxy @LukeAlmighty @dave
>and had both a stimulant and a depressant in his system.
Literally what killed Michael Jackson by the way. Or maybe he also couldn't breath!... Oh no, Derek Chauvin strikes again!

>chauvin probably should have been charged with something like negligent homicide or involuntary manslaughter
Chauvin was nothing more than a scapegoat offered to a woke lynch mob hoping it would calm it down. It didn't, because you can't reason with the reasonless.

@Ok123 @Humpleupagus @dave @EverySingleTIme
That's not motte and bailey son, that's just me stating the obvious that there are plenty of evil deed that Hitler did. One doesn't need to rely on a single fact to prove he was a blight on Germany and the world.

@EverySingleTIme @Humpleupagus @dave @Ok123
The Soviet Union was evil too, and there's been enough vilification of the British Empire, that I didn't think I needed to add to it. Does the existence of other evil entities somehow disprove that Hitler and Nazi Germany couldn't have been evil forces that wanted to conquer the world?

@Ok123 @dave
>If you actually are jewish I'll let you leave the discussion
I'll be whatever you want me to be. I'll your kawaii moe jewish anime girl waifu, if you want. UwU

Over and over again, at best you have threats being made towards Jews. You have talking about potential extermination, but you don't have talking about "this extermination is currently taking place", like you should to match your claim of "jews made up a holocaust before Hitler's holocaust happened". All you're proving is that people in Europe didn't like jews, so they persecuted them, threatened their lives, and it gotten to the point that outright extermination was beginning to form as a plan. But your twisted mind somehow sees this proof that the holocaust didn't happen, instead of the obvious "this is the state of mind of the average european, this is why it was almost inevitable for a holocaust to happen in Europe".

And finally, cause it's the last thing I have the patience to respond to:
"What about the other newspaper claim that 6 million jews had been expelled from Russia in 1905?"
You have proof that it didn't happen? You yourself pointed that there was no census after that date because of WWI so you wouldn't know if people were expelled. You complain that there were only 5.2 million Jews by the census in 1897, but ignore any potential population change before 1905, ignore any potential migration, and most importantly, YOU'RE OBSESSED OVER A FRICKING NUMBER. These numbers are meant as approximations for fucks sake. When will you people get this through your thick skull! If the article making the claim actually said exactly 5.2 million, would you have accepted it then? Would you have looked at the census and said "yup, checks out"?! Are you that kind of autistic or something? Oh no, people round up numbers for artistic purposes! How could they!

>newspapers report that millions of Jews were oppressed or persecuted, all over the place, well before Hitler
>"See this proves the holocaust didn't happen! They were making the 6 million figure up! 6 million jews weren't killed! They made it all up!"

You literally prove with your newspaper clippings that Jews were treated poorly all over Europe. That's all you prove. None of them make claims that there were planned exterminations taking place at that time. So you can't say "they were fabricating a holocaust event before the holocaust". The best you have is a claim that Russia was considering a policy of extermination, but you don't seem to have the corresponding claim of that Russian extermination actively taking place. I would expect that to be front and center, as it would make your claims most believable.

It's baffling that you see these news articles, and you firstly convince yourself that the claims must be false and made up. Europe doesn't have a nice history of treating ethnic minorities well. Especially not Jewish minorities, considering how Christianity put the blame on them for Jesus' death. So is it possible that millions of Jews were being discriminated against in Europe well before Nazi Germany? Of course. Why wouldn't they be? Why would you believe this to be false? Why would you believe this to be so false to where somehow Hitler wouldn't have did the holocaust? If your version is true, that Jews were trying to make this shit up for decades, considering you view Hitler as a saint, capable of seeing through "Jewish deception", why wouldn't he try to get rid of the people creating such lies? It just sounds like all the more reason for Hitler to get rid of them. Even if I give this to you, it still doesn't make sense that this somehow disproves Hitler's holocaust.

I do have to give something to you guys. You did manage to cherry pick a lot of articles with the number "6 million" in them. Good job! Do you want an award?
Why are you people obsessed over a number? If every article said "3 million" you would have been obsessed over that. If they said "10 million", the same. If they said "millions", the same. It's pretty clear to me that it's used more as an approximation, a rough number. Why 6 million, not 5, or 7? My best guess is because 6 is half a dozen. As an european, I always thought it odd that Americans seem to approximate things to "dozens", while I would towards "tens". So if approximating prosecuted jews to dozens or a dozen of millions was too much, it's likely that the obvious number would have been "half a dozen million", but just write it out as 6 million.
I hear a claim "6" has some significance to jews, I don't care enough about religious claims to look into it. Say it's true. So? Just makes them more inclined to approximate stuff towards a half dozen, 6 (million) than towards half a ten, 5 (million). Does that mean that millions of people weren't oppressed before Nazi Germany or that millions of people didn't die in the holocaust? Of course not. It just means that when you know there were A LOT, but probably less then 10 million and more than 1 million, you're just go towards 6 million as the approximation instead of 5 million. Big deal, I don't care. They could come out tomorrow and make the number exactly 6.666.666 and I still wouldn't care.

>Hitler was a good person, not racist, was the first to ban animal experimentation

... I'm not even laughing at the not racist part, that is to be expected. I'm laughing at the "ban animal experimentation" part. Now THAT'S a massive one... jesus fuck...

@EverySingleTIme @dave @Ok123
>Hitler was pushing for peace! Trust me! Hitler good boy!
Heard this one before. We're done here.