Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀 @alyx@gameliberty.club

@coolboymew
I still have no clue why Idubbz became popular, but after seeing a few clips of how his wife behaves towards him, I really hope the next chapter in this story is them getting divorced.

@beardalaxy And the people that tried getting Trump arrested and assassinated didn't release that info because?...

@LukeAlmighty I can plow her. Anything else, no promises.

F1 Mega Torrent

@LukeAlmighty It's a sim game. The achievement is for the people who end up playing 500+ hours messing around.

@LukeAlmighty Getting soil on the crystal island is trivial next to making a new landmass in the middle of an ocean. And considering how many states have started making artificial islands all over the place, clearly there is some demand for new empty landmass, that you can build on however you want, without pesky environmental restrictions.

Haven't watched the movie in a while, so I don't remember if this was an one-off achievement, or if Lex could have made more islands if he wanted. If it was the latter, then he'd definitely be able to make a business out of creating crystal landmass.

@BasedLunatic
Hamas.

@maxmustermann If the deep state actually agreed to back down, and allow Trump to reform America, under the condition that everything Epstein related gets closed forever, honestly I'd take it. Not the best outcome, but not the worst either. At least you could hope that things go back on track for the nation, and you could hope to reform the justice system, so that you don't get another Epstein like child trafficking cult that gets away with it.

For now though, I'm not convinced this is what happened. I'm more inclined to believe that everyone involved, from Trump, to Bondi, to Kash Patel, ran off their mouths, because they actually thought the FBI had a perfect case against Epstein and clients, but it was being suppressed by higher ups. Only to be left with eggs on their faces when they discover that the FBI of the past did a shitty job, and it doesn't actually have the evidence everyone thought they did.

So you have the likes of Bondi making it sound like she has the Epstein client list on her desk, only for a sentence later, in the same interview, to also say she didn't actually look at the documents that reached her desk. Funny that people who now keep citing that piece of an interview fail to notice her directly saying "I didn't look at it yet". How would she know there was a list if she didn't look? The reality is, she didn't know. She lied to make herself look good, because she was that convinced the client list must exist and be in the possession of the FBI, so it didn't cross her mind that what she was saying was even a lie, or that someone would catch the lie.

Right now I think either FBI was so incompetent, that they really didn't manage to investigate the Epstein thing at all, they missed evidence, they failed to collect it, etc., so they didn't have enough to go investigate further down the rabbit hole. And without Epstein or Maxwell squealing like a pig, they had nothing.

Or the other big possibility, the evidence has already been destroyed prior to this year. The people responsible will of course not admit to something like that, and the destruction will have been hidden enough that someone like Kash Patel wouldn't even realize that what he's looking at is tempering with evidence instead of just a lack of evidence.

In either case, you have a sleuth of people that bragged about releasing stuff out of the FBI if they get in charge, and now they discover they don't actually have much to release. It's the same shit as with the JFK story. Everyone was so sure that more released documents would reveal how the CIA killed JFK. Well... you had more documents released. Haven't heard anyone saying anything since. Another big nothing burger. It's the same thing. People assumed FBI/CIA had some world shattering info, and then got disappointed when it turns out they didn't.

Only regular people can't even cope with their disappointment that they were wrong. So they'll keep inventing new conspiracy theories, until they can manage to explain why Trump and his team didn't release the info they wanted to be true. "Trump made a deal with the Deep State!!!". Sure. Definitely. I'm pretty sure the deep state would rather ignite all nuclear weapons on US soil then cut a deal with Trump.

@JoeBravo77 I personally don't believe the "Brigitte Macron is a man" thing, but this is incredibly hilarious. Hope she ends up having to pull her trousers down to finally stop people talking.

@mushroom_soup You think that's bad? Wait till you hear that the tissue cut gets used by the makeup industry. I guess women enjoy tiny baby dicks on their faces. (ok, now I am exaggerating a bit. As far as I know, they're not actually putting them in face creams, but rather they use the foreskin as a testing medium, to make sure makeup is human safe. Still fucked up though).

@mischievoustomato Don't know who that is, but the French cannot be trusted. They speak the language of the devil.

@mischievoustomato
Thank god!

@Mr_NutterButter @mushroom_soup
What was the saying: women control access to sex, men control access to relationships? Sounds like your definition of incel conforms to this.

@Mr_NutterButter Zeus: bruh... there's only so much I can do.

@lain @VD15
Clearly. One is about the power of friendship and individuality, and the other is about... gambling?

@VD15 If I were a cop, I'd pull him over, and do the most stereotypical gay dude voice I can muster.

@Cruise2 I don't want your email address. I think you'd be incredibly stupid if you gave it to me. It would probably confuse me to no end if you did, to the point I'd end up crashing out and making a long post about how completely brain dead you are for giving me your email address.
The worst part of it is, someone might end up seeing this, think I'm trying to do reverse psychology on them, and then somehow they'll still end up giving me their email.
Point is, humans really are that stupid.

@LukeAlmighty 2008 was such a different time...

@BasedLunatic
Yup. Probably the best position to have in general. My conclusion thus far on ideologies is that any single ideology is prone to be faulty and inadequate for building and maintaining societies on its own, because of the single fact that no single ideology will be able to completely explain and account for all the diversity of human behavior and interactions.

To give an example, communism, as an ideology, will always fail because it doesn't account for the fact that people can be selfish. Pure conservatism fails because humans like to try new things, experiences, so you can't restrict them to the same old traditions, culture, way of doing things. Pure progressive liberalism fails simply because humans are not equal in ability and some are capable of great evil. And so on.

Combine aspects from many ideologies, and you might be able to make a good society, because you balance things, and cover the holes of one ideology with another. But at that point, you're starting to no longer follow an ideology, and you're simply testing out policies that society can flourish in, without having an underlying explanatory theory/ideology, that predicts, models and explains why these policies work.