I gotta watch the video if I get a honorable mention

Follow

He mentions my arguments but doesn't show my tweets :feelsbadman:

There is a point buried in this video, but it is overshadowed by him being butthurt.

There are active efforts to primarily demasculinize men and secondarily masculinize women. We have seen these quite extensively in Hollywood and AAA in the last I guess 8-10 years with the strong female character. It is also quite visible in many lawsuits, articles and allegation regarding sexual harassment and "toxic" behavior, where banter (big component of male bonding) or simple invitation to dinner are portrayed as behaviors that ought to be eliminated.

This isn't an effort at role reversal like AA claims. It is an effort to equalize, remove differences and a part of Marcuse's biological foundation for socialism from his essay on liberation, where people are indoctrinated and eventually evolved into desiring socialism. We live in the world of Herbert Marcuse.

AA is also an absolute butthurt retard by overanalyzing and inserting meaning into replies. Where he says that Nick wants to be an schoolgirl with a penis. No. That's not how the internet works. Nick saw a picture of an attractive woman, maybe said "Nice" in his head and then went into his reaction folder with the thought of "What's a funny reaction that will get me likes". There is no hidden meaning. Just like when I type ROFL, I maybe exhaled more strongly, I'm not rolling on the floor laughing or even desire to do so.

His blaming of anime as being part of the problem is also unfounded: youtu.be/f2prtR2ZNIk

Also his mischaracterisation of liberalism is annoying. Nothing in liberalism means not caring. It just gives you the freedom to care about things you find important.

And his smugness and desire to be a tyrannical dictator buries any legitimacy or relevancy his videos have.

I forgot one important thing: The Devil doesn't exist you retard

@pensees
I'm not sure Marcuse read Gramsci when he wrote his essay on liberation, but yeah, they are important figures too.

@matrix
It seems ridiculous to compare rough, psychopathic and abusive mary sues to kind yet masculine tomboys.

@matrix I think its actually probably a little simpler. Men just overall love flat healthy stomachs because it shows you're young, without kids, and so fertile, and abs are a form of that

@matrix @applejack
This, plus we live in the middle of fat epidemic.
And abbs are the first thing hidden by fat. But outside of fat epidemic, any slightly active girl would have abs at least somehow visible.

@matrix @applejack the girl to the right looks like a preteen, fertile isn’t the first thing that comes to mind

@realcaseyrollins
Yeah, but she isn't that far off, however the point works even if that example is a bit shotty.
@applejack

@realcaseyrollins @matrix Yes, but also no. She's even more fertile since her entire fertility can be yours if you wait

Thinking of it as a bad thing is akin to complaining about a woman because shes not pregnant *yet*

Also, if I wanted to post a pre-teen tummy I would have. I think shes like 14 or something

@applejack @matrix I thought fertility refers to present ability to bear children, not future ability to bear children

@realcaseyrollins @matrix Well, if a woman's not pregnant, she's not very "fertile", is she?

@applejack
Oh wait, minor disagreement. Women are fertile for like 30 years. Not having children is attractive because the man would have to provide for children that aren't his at the detriment of his own.

@matrix I don't see why thatðs a disagreement. I said "without kids" for that reason

@applejack
Oh I understood it as: without kids and therefore fertile.

@matrix There is some physical strain from it, so she might be less fertile, but that's probably a much lesser thing

@applejack
I don't think it makes much difference compared to age or unhealthy lifestyle.

@matrix look I have a demon daddy fetish, don't take this away from me. I don't have much else in this world.

@matrix Honestly the entire issue that he and other traditionalists are failing with is that people don't like being told what they can and cannot view. Men enjoy femininity and desire it, the issue is that women have been taught that is a bad thing and must reject it... at least that's what we're seeing most women are doing. If anything anime is helping the West and I'm seeing more women who are fans of anime act more feminine and vice versa with men.

@matrix Something else I'd like to add, the coomer argument only applies if the man or women in question isn't doing what is necessary to better their situation. Shit it doesn't even have to be porn related. In the 1920's they blamed their problems on booze for fuck sake. Oh and Japan has a healthy sexual culture. The west has an unhealthy sexual culture. We either suppress it because it makes Jesus sad or like any vice we over indulge in it because fuck modesty.

@matrix If we just treated it very nonchalantly aka oh someone made a porno, eh who gives a shit I've got better things to do, then a lot of this wouldn't be a problem. Obviously we shouldn't be encouraging women to be acting like sluts and etc, but at the same time we shouldn't be telling people how they should live their lives. More like presenting consequences and etc. The issues are complicated and need to be dismantled and honestly it all starts from parents raising their kids.

@matrix I guess in AA's mind I was corrupted as a child because I watched too much Dragonball Z, Gundam Wing, Tenchi Muyo, and YuYu Hakusho. Never mind western shows like Batman The Animated Series having traditional masculine and feminine roles and sexualizing the women. Also never mind Swat Kats, Thunder Cats, Gargoyles, Spider-Man The Animated Series, X-Men, etc. None of those shows were appropriate. Little boys and girls should watch Davy and Goliath or some dumb shit.

@matrix discussed, not dismantled. Sorry kind of tired when I'm writing this.

@MorphBox @matrix
>japan
>porn sold in quickie marts
>love hotels
>compensated dating
>"healthy sexual culture"

@Godcast @matrix compared to what's going on in the West, yeah I'd say it's pretty healthy. Love hotels aren't encourage and neither is buying porn mags and etc. It's the opposite actually. They don't ban it either. You just get dirty looks and etc. Basically how the West used to handle things like that.

@Godcast @matrix No, it's the correct way of handling it. You let people fail or indulge in their vice in a healthy way. If you worked hard and are choosing to sleep with a beautiful woman you either don't know or barely know I don't see an issue with that if you have no desire to have children or a relationship. If you're just letting life pass you by and are just masturbating, you've bigger problems than just jerking it. Clearly one is winning and the other is losing.

@Godcast @matrix *you've got bigger problems* had to make the correction there.

@MorphBox @matrix thats a cute idea until civilization starts breaking down, as we're presently observing
@Godcast @MorphBox @matrix you're talking about healthy sexual behavior with someone from baraag

@James10550088 @matrix @Godcast So because I use this instance, my arguments are automatically invalid or did you mean something else by that comment? Me thinks you're being dishonest.

@Godcast @matrix is it breaking down because of over indulgence or because we gave people the freedom to choose? The problem is that society couldn't come up with an argument against people be sexually depraved as we see in pride parades beyond muh Jesus. That crowd overplayed their hand and now the proverbial chickens have come home to roost. Maybe instead of doing dumb shit like that, instead just make the argument that maybe you shouldn't do that stuff because X, Y, and Z.

@MorphBox @matrix overindulgence. 100%. Any society that abandons traditional sexual morality has a three-generation countdown to collapse. I highly recommend JD Unwin's exhaustive "Sex and Culture" for more. Your ignorance is striking. Not only has the moral argument been deployed against hedonism, but the data is on the side of sexual modesty. Trannies killing themselves at record numbers and fags fucking each other to death should suffice to prove my point. The only chickens coming home to roost are those of braindead, psychopathic social libertarians whose entire moral framework orbits their next high, and the only question they ask is "What's the worst that can happen?" So far we're up to "trans kids."

@Godcast @matrix Your hyperbole is quite amusing. As I said the issue is complex and the USA had a healthy sexuality with brothels and etc. They weren't encouraged and people generally frowned upon you if you went to such places. The consequences for these actions were you basically becoming a social pariah. Then the government stepped in to try and "fix" the problem. This resulted in street hookers and lots of unsafe sex. Oh and before you say "Um actually that happened in brothels too"

@Godcast @matrix yes I'm aware of that. Al Capone didn't die from gun shots and etc after all. However you had far less of these issues because of society frowning on such a life path for women and men indulging with them. Also my morals are to live you best life and to not allow yourself to be controlled by your vices. Indulge in them if you wish, but never allow the vice become your life. Very Stoic as that's what I am.

@Godcast @matrix Oh and BTW I'm aware of the numbers in terms the trannies killing themselves and etc. These people need help and no not from God, they need help on a human level and not a socialist one. As for trans kids, I don't know anyone beyond leftoid retards who think that is a good idea in terms of ethics and science. For everyone 1 child that has Gender Dysphoria, you have what 10 normal healthy children?

@Godcast @matrix *live your best life* had to do another correction.

@MorphBox @matrix You had far less of the issue because vanishingly few people participated in deviant sexuality. You can't simply insist on "this far and no farther," that's an argument you've already lost. Christopher Cantwell had a similar morality, until he found himself addicted to meth. You can gripe about other's problems becoming your problems as much as you like, but vice breeds vice, and suddenly your libertarianism cou ts for nothing. If a crack den doesn't spring up in your neighborhood, then they'll just vote to put one there.

@Godcast

@matrix ah yes more hyperbole. Meth and wanting to fuck are not even remotely close. If you are doing meth, then you need to seek help immediately. Also every human has a form of a vice. Smoking, drinking, thrill seeking, fucking, religious fanaticism, fanaticism in general. All it takes is moderation to maintain the use of the vice as I've already said.

@Godcast @matrix
The crack house on the street corner wouldn't exist if the government and big pharma propped up by said government gave them the power to control drugs. Honestly legalizing all drugs is the solution to that problem.

@MorphBox @matrix "more access to drugs means less drugs" 🤔
@MorphBox @matrix meanwhile in reality, we've seen a rise in drug abuse, harder drugs and deadlier drugs right alongside more permissive attitudes towards sexual deviancy. So there's that point sunk. Saying "people just need to moderate their smack addiction" is braindead wishful thinking and part of the reason the US has a gigantic heroin problem. But keep hitting me with what-ifs
@Godcast @MorphBox @matrix this sounds like the "if one is 'high-functioning' and not directly causing bodily harm to others, then the vices one engages in are okay/morally-neutral" argument?
@scalar @MorphBox @matrix that's libertarians in a nutshell. I know a libertarian who could make it to work on time despite a crippling fentanyl addiction if he was into that. They project their proclivities and autism onto others.
Show newer

@Godcast @matrix Never did, you're constructing a strawman. Also I'm basing this on reality and history. If you deregulate something and just let the community handle it, things tend to be better. By having over reaching power, like what the government did in the roaring 20's with prohibition, you get increase in violent crime, sex abuse, and everything else we're seeing today. The solution, ban prohibition.

@MorphBox @matrix
>"I'm basing this on history!"
>rattles off ahistorical circumstances and retarded libertarian talking points

Uh huh. I'm pretty sure Somalia has what you're looking for. How's that working out for them?
Show newer
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.