@mactonite are you aware of the concept of conscience
@mactonite I am not asking about the ethics of sea monkeys inter-non-society that they naturally do not have; I am asking about the ethics of human beings towards sea monkeys, because human ethics can be applied to everything that surrounds humans, sea monkeys included
of course ethics can be and is applied to animals, objects, imaginary things and general concepts: like, if I see a rando on the internet screeching about lolicon being literal pedophilia, I know that he has no ethics
@LukeAlmighty yes, exposing your genital area to random innocent people is highly immoral
>you can't shame men for manspreading, it's naaaaaaaturaaaal
women have been shamed for simply having a body for literal millennia, so why should I have any reservations about returning the favor
besides, no natural causes justify taking two seats and loudly chatting on a phone
pretentiously muslim shirts only added to the disgusting aggressive vibe
more games should have a disclaimer like this instead of "w-we acknowledge the negative impart of old stereotypes, we are sooooo soooowwwyyyyy for making our previous games vibrant, diverse, and interesting instead of the same sweet baby mandated slop"
the game is The King of Dragon Pass and it's the fine example of a "one more turn" game
@beardalaxy @MoeBritannica they'll just axe the same loocalizers pay and move them to chief editors' positions where the most of censoring is going on anyway
so for the worst of lolcowlizers nothing will change, those who strive to make good translations will get just fucked furthermore ❤️
are sea monkeys ethical?
on one hand, selling something living to literal 5 y/os is never going to end well, so the creatures are going to die horrible death in a plastic toy tank
on the other, the so-called sea monkeys are the literal bottom of food chain and mostly bred as live feed for fish anyway while a supervised 5 y/o might love them dearly and they seem to be fine with a plastic tank (unlike fish)
@LukeAlmighty well, you live in some alternative lalaland where bears are somehow more dangerous than men, so no wonder
@LukeAlmighty peers? lmao no, the kids were absolutely property (in the same way as women)
then, depending on luck or the lack of it, your property was bought by another family if you had girls; or your lords took away your sons as what now would be their property
@xianc78 assuming it's not bait...
>uranium
lmao, he is a scam, I'd love to see him trying to eat caesium 137
nobody know what exactly causes parkinson's either, could be radiation
>Chernobyl wildlife
it's mutated, silly, plenty of video and photo and physical evidence of that; and no matter what you thought, the half-life of what kaboomed there was about 30 years
too many ppl, and pretty much all faux trads do not realize that their idealized child raising model where you care about the fine details of their overall development is incredibly recent
before that you were either too poor, so children were at best additional workforce in the family and at worst a liability you literally can't afford to feed; or rich enough to not give a shit about your children ever and outsource them to nannies or just a boarding school
and no matter whether you're rich or poor, your kids are not guaranteed to live to see their 5th birthday so better not to get attached to them too much
@beardalaxy history quite literally writes itself and putting your best foot forward only leads to it being cut off first
♡ i identify as an eldritch horror beyond human comprehension ♡
♡ normally I don't fedpost, but in case I ever do: it's all fiction in the genre of satire and has nothing in common with tangible reality ♡