xianc78 @xianc78@gameliberty.club

@cee @icedquinn @herag @shebang @kerosene @vera @matthew@helladoge.com @0x520 @maksimilian_stepniakov @waltercool @ardaissad @lanodan @Indigo @top @Andrii @Alex Okay, I maybe confused some people. When people talk about Panarchism it usually refers to two related but separate things:

* Multiple legal providers competing in the same physical space, similar to Ancient Ireland or the Icelandic Commonwealth.
OR
* Anarchists of all flavors creating voluntary communities based on their school of thought. Basically the same thing as anarchism without adjectives but also including Ancaps into the mix.

I think I fall into the latter category, but I'm not against people trying the former.

@shebang @icedquinn @herag @kerosene @cee @vera @matthew@helladoge.com @0x520 @maksimilian_stepniakov @waltercool @ardaissad @lanodan @Indigo @top @Andrii @Alex

People are expected to respect others ways of life via the NAP. Logically, Marxists-Leninists can't just take from non-marxists, but they can take from other marxists since they consent to that.

But realistically, I think the communists will just have communes where it's only them and I think the social democrats would do the same. So, yeah the communists would probably keep a distance from everywhere else. I see the capitalists (not necessarily ancaps) having different types of governments in the same space.

@shebang @icedquinn @herag @kerosene @cee @vera @matthew@helladoge.com @0x520 @maksimilian_stepniakov @waltercool @ardaissad @lanodan @Indigo @top @Andrii @Alex The only difference is that it's all voluntary. If you don't want to be govern and don't care about the benefits you can simply choose to have no government at all.

@shebang @icedquinn @herag @kerosene @cee @vera @matthew@helladoge.com @0x520 @maksimilian_stepniakov @waltercool @ardaissad @lanodan @Indigo @top @Andrii @Alex Choosing a government will give you benefits that you wouldn't get if you didn't choose said government (access to their schools, utilities, etc).