@alyx Deliberately manipulating data is not science. NASA, the IPCC, and others have all been caught doing it. Also, just look at all the predictions they make and how flat out wrong they are. You also aren't taking into account the fact that scientists will discard conclusions if they don't go with the mainstream narrative. Science is corrupt and has been for a long time.
Most scientists can't even repeat their own experiments. Including findings in "peer-reviewed" papers. Pic related.
>Also who the fuck is James Corbett and why should I even waste a second on a nobody who's highest credentials is a humanities degree and the proud owner of a blog page?
He has done extensive research on many topics like 9/11, COVID, war propaganda, and of course climate change. Like I said, he has interviewed many scientists on the matter. He has also gone over the history and has covered things that even most conservatives and mainstream libertarians don't dare to touch, like how the climate change agenda has connections with the eugenics and technocracy movements. The whole thing is a scam to push for one world government and population control.
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1446-james-corbett-on-the-post-carbon-energy-eugenics-hoax/
@Fiddle Fucking switch to Monero already.
@alyx
1:49 mark
>Get your information from reputable science media
How many of those "reputable sources" are funded by organizations like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation? Also, there have been scientists who have spoken out about this NWO scam. James Corbett has interviewed some of them.
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1261-judith-curry-explains-climate-modeling-to-the-layman/
And don't give me the "97% of scientists agree" bullshit. There is no such thing as consensus science. That's not how science works.
Something big is going to happen on September 24th. Just going by the Gematria, it doesn't look good.
https://nitter.poast.org/Harrison_102/status/1570505934622826496#m
@feral_apothecary Where have you been for the past year?