Show newer

@dielan @RustyCrab @rher @Hoss @coolboymew Crypto-integration is really unnecessary given that you can just post links to crypto wallets anywhere, unless they are talking about crypto ads or being able to access members-only content with it.

@dielan @RustyCrab @rher @Hoss @coolboymew Odysee is probably the closest to a viable YouTube alternative because there are a few non-political Youtubers on there unlike Bitchute where it's 90% culture war and conspiracy shit. Though their future still seems uncertain after the company behind LBRY shut down. It seems like they are now switching to a different blockchain because of it.

@ArdainianRight Sure but few go into much detail as him. Corbett has an entire podcast dedicated to solutions. Most other people say that there needs to be a "mass awakening" or that "we need to organize" without talking about what that entails and how it's going to work.

Red Ice is another outlet I listen to despite disagree with some of their views and it bothers me how they keep on saying that people need to organize and "create parallel societies" without talking about how it's going to be done.

@ArdainianRight If you just dropped your knee-jerk reaction to James Corbett, you would know that he made videos on solutions to both Blackrock and the Federal Reserve. Say what you want about him, but he is one of the few alternative media outlets that actually talks about solutions.

corbettreport.com/living-fiat-
corbettreport.com/solutionswat

xianc78 boosted
xianc78 boosted
_MAJOR Market Crash is COMING, Economist Warns Of 90%+ Market Crash Next Year, FED DESTROYING US_

When Harry Dent speaks, you should listen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0MaXHpGHeQ
xianc78 boosted
xianc78 boosted
xianc78 boosted
xianc78 boosted
xianc78 boosted
xianc78 boosted
An excerpt from Hoppe:

Many libertarians hold the view that all that is needed to maintain a libertarian social order is the strict enforcement of the non-aggression principle (NAP). Yet... it does not hold and apply, or rather it is insufficient, when it comes to people living in close proximity to each other, as neighbors and cohabitants of the same community.

A simple example suffices to make the point. Assume a new next-door neighbor. This neighbor does not aggress against you or your property in any way, but he is a “bad” neighbor. He is littering on his own neighboring property, turning it into a garbage heap; in the open, for you to see, he engages in ritual animal slaughter, he turns his house into a “Freudenhaus,” a bordello, with clients coming and going all day and all night long; he never offers a helping hand and never keeps any promise that he has made; or he cannot or else he refuses to speak to you in your own language. Etc., etc.. Your life is turned into a nightmare. Yet you may not use violence against him, because he has not aggressed against you. What can you do? You can shun and ostracize him. But your neighbor does not care, and in any case you alone thus ‘punishing’ him makes little if any difference to him. You have to have the communal respect and authority, or you must turn to someone who does, to persuade and convince everyone or at least most of the members of your community to do likewise and make the bad neighbor a social outcast, so as to exert enough pressure on him to sell his property and leave. (So much for the libertarians who, in addition to their “live and let live” ideal also hail the motto “respect no authority!”)

The lesson? The peaceful cohabitation of neighbors and of people in regular direct contact with each other on some territory – a tranquil, convivial social order – requires also a commonality of culture... multi-culturalism, cultural heterogeneity, cannot exist in one and the same place and territory without leading to diminishing social trust, increased tension, and ultimately the call for a “strong man” and the destruction of anything resembling a libertarian social order.

And moreover: Just as a libertarian order must always be on guard against “bad” (even if non-aggressive) neighbors by means of social ostracism, ... so, and indeed even more vigilantly so, must it be guarded against neighbors who openly advocate communism, socialism, syndicalism or democracy in any shape or form. They, in thereby posing an open threat to all private property and property owners, must not only be shunned, but they must, to use a by now somewhat famous Hoppe-meme, be “physically removed,” if need be by violence, and forced to leave for other pastures. Not to do so inevitably leads to – well, communism, socialism, syndicalism or democracy and hence, the very opposite of a libertarian social order.
xianc78 boosted

@PurpCat @BigDawg869789 Some are claiming that the whole trials themselves are a psyop just to get people to believe that they can get into legal trouble for questioning certain events that the government doesn't want you to question.

mileswmathis.com/jones3.pdf

xianc78 boosted
xianc78 boosted

@PurpCat @BigDawg869789 Wasn't the FPS Russia guy also supposedly murdered after the shooting?

@BigDawg869789 It happened around the same time that Obama said he would sign the "Small Arms Treaty" at the UN which was basically an international gun control treaty.

web.archive.org/web/2014030523

@ryan @JustinCody They haven't done it yet. I know it's ultimately a band-aid solution, but it's better than nothing.

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.