@noyoushutthefuckupdad Move to New Hampshire and at least you won't have to pay car insurance.
@gabriel I do not take anyone who combines psychology with their own personal politics seriously. That's a dangerous combination as it just leads you to believe that anyone who disagrees with you is mentally ill.
Secret Grand Jury Convened to Unmask Anonymous Government Critic on Reddit
https://reclaimthenet.org/federal-prosecutors-reddit-grand-jury-anonymous-user-ice-criticism?utm_source=fediverse
@nanook My company actually pulled out of Europe. I want to say almost a decade ago when the GDPR and some other legislation predating that were passed. We decided to call it quits in Europe. It's an over regulated impoverished shit hole where any efficiency and improvements in operating their are dwarfed by the costs. It was roughly the same cost for us to ship goods into Europe via expedited shipping as it was to operate a warehouse in Europe and ship from within. The delivery time and cost ended up being about the same. The question became why bother when the amount of regulation we had to comply with kept on increasing. It eventually became not-worth-it. The consequences are Europeans are now at a disadvantage and can not obtain the hardware and accessories that work with GNU/Linux properly quite as easily. The one positive about operating from within Europe is users don't have to deal with customs. Now they do. They did this to themselves.
@djsumdog
>I remember Lunduke, who bleeps out swears, went out of his way to quote that one exactly.
It seems like he wants to go by FCC radio logic where the seven words are bad but slurs are fine.
>Ugh, how the fuck does DeVault have any friends?
One of life's greatest mysteries. I'm surprise that he has a following given that he was infamous on programming calculator forums for hijacking communities and causing pointless drama, and not just related to politics or religion either. He threaten to leave the Omnimaga forums (the community he contributed to the most in his early years) unless a MLP thread that he didn't have to participate in was locked (this was back when the brony phenomenon was starting to take off), and the staff locked the thread only because he contributed so much to the forum that they couldn't let him go. He only got banned from the forum after deleting their IRC channel and a thread on someone else's calculator language because he couldn't win an argument against someone. Not only that, but he apparently was also known for posting porn links when nobody asked (no archives unfortunately, but was claimed by users of said forums).
If people would just remove their political bias for one moment and see how he acted on those forums, I'm pretty sure people would think less highly of him.
@coolboymew I thought Nicalis abandoned that version long ago.
@djsumdog You're better off doing the latter as Codeberg's CEO is friends with Drew DeVault and wrote an entire blogpost about their stance against "right-wing extremism" after someone merely created a throw away account to just post "NIGGERBALLS" on their issue tracker.
There are also some Git-over-Nostr solutions if you want something even more decentralized.
Shit like this makes me wonder if I would've been happier if I joined the RPGCodex forums instead of here back in 2020. (Decided to join either that or fedi after all the 8/v/ bunker drama) At least on a forum I can sort of avoid the politisperging and talk about my hobbies. I only picked this place because I'm not particularly interested in CRPGs and I was in favor of decentralization.
Europe's got a new contradiction in law: If big tech doesn't scan for illegal content on their social media platforms they'll get charged with violating the Digital Services Act which mandates scanning. However if they do scan for illegal content they'll be charged with violating EU's 2021 privacy law: The EU Privacy Act.
The question comes up again and again. When prosecutors have no problem prosecuting those they dislike rather than those doing wrong why would anyone bother complying given the costs, burdens, and lost business of doing so?
When your best effort at complying still results in criminal violation due to contradictions in the law it stops making sense to comply.
"The regulatory gap has created uncertainty for big tech companies, because while scanning for harms on their platforms is now illegal, they still remain liable to remove any illegal content hosted on their platforms under a different law, the Digital Services Act. Google, Meta, Snap and Microsoft said they would continue to voluntarily scan their platforms for CSAM, in a joint statement posted on a Google blog. "
This should also be a huge red flag for the rest of society of the dangers of using big tech and mainstream social media platforms. Once you scan for one thing- it's ultimately used for other 'bad' things. This is already true. First it was child porn, but now it's a laundry list of things that are far more questionable.