xianc78 @xianc78@gameliberty.club

@BigTony @natsock @ItsSkyDragonz If all else fails, we can try seasteading.

https://www.seasteading.org/

@Twoinchdestroya @ChristiJunior @RupertvonRipp It's not blackpilling because the real solutions are grassroots. Voting doesn't work because all politicians are puppets of the shadow government. I've already talked about this on my website.

https://xianc78.codeberg.page/articles/save-yourself.html

@BigTony @natsock @ItsSkyDragonz The link I shared in my second previous post should explain it all.

@BigTony @natsock @ItsSkyDragonz Because there are real solutions out there like agorism, non-compliance, and self-sufficiency. All of these take power away from the state. If enough people do these things, then the state will collapse.

@natsock @ItsSkyDragonz My Mom still ignores me. My Dad is slowly waking up, but still believes in voting for local and state governments.

@natsock @ItsSkyDragonz What good does letting them still participate in fake elections going to do. It's better to try to explain them that democracy is a scam and to show them a solution that actually works.

https://anarkio.codeberg.page/agorism/

@hakui @cee @lanodan That sounds more like Panarchism (opt-in/opt-out governments and societies) which is what I identify more with.

https://www.panarchy.org/depuydt/1860.eng.html

@Moon The only feature phone I ever had was a Samsung Brightside. That thing was a piece of shit even by feature phone standards.

@lanodan @cee @hakui But to be fair, Max Stirner actually never claimed to be an anarchist, contrary to popular belief. His philosophy did influence a bunch of anarchist writings though.

@lanodan @cee @hakui Not really. Just their property norms. The Ancap/Voluntaryist norm of mixing labor with unclaimed property is more consistent because the state can't use that logic since most of their land is stolen. The Egoist property norm allows someone to take said property if their offense outranks the previous owner's defense which is what the state does all the time.

Max Stirner was an influential person, don't get me wrong, but he seemed to be inconsistent on a lot of things. Not to say the Murray Rothbard, David Friedman, Samuel Konkin III, or Hans Herman Hoppe are/weren't inconsistent on things either.

@cee @lanodan @hakui
>To paraphrase Stirner- whoever knows how to take, to defend the thing, to care for it, to him belongs property.

Governments can use that same logic to defend statism, saying that the land they claim and defend with military force is theirs. It seems like Egoists are statists after all.