@parker@pl.psion.co @graf@poa.st
This is why we should replace the left/right - auth/lib political compass with moral/amoral - honour/dishonour.
Interesting concept.@theorytoe@ak.kyaruc.moe
Hot take: I think it's proof that federation is working.
The utopian ideal of a single all-encompassing fediverse shouldn't be the goal, but that servers who want to interact can do so without interference from third parties.
You'll notice their attempts to police the entire network have largely failed, as more and more people splinter off and create new instances with saner policies and approaches.
I'd argue if they were being successful, Mastodon would be the only server software.
So it turns out that people still make dumb TVs. That's good to know.
So, what can be done?
1. Tell new people to use third party apps, they are better anyway and have more features. More info at https://fedi.tips/which-apps-can-i-use-should-i-use-the-official-app-or-a-third-party-app/
2. Tell people to sign up on the website. Mastodon's official site at https://joinmastodon.org is still asking people to choose a server, and is very professionally laid out. (I've also got my own amateurish effort at https://fedi.garden.)
3. If you're comfortable using github, give a thumbs up at https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon-ios/issues/1023
(6/6)
Yes, signing up on one server is much easier for people who are used to centralised services like Twitter, Facebook etc.
But as we have seen from Twitter, such a setup leaves you at the mercy of Musk-type takeovers. For-profit social networks do not like federation, they hate it as they see it as competition. It is very likely that a commercial takeover of a majority server would defederate it, to prevent people leaving and simplify its maintenance.
(4/6)