xianc78 @xianc78@gameliberty.club

Confirmation of what many knew, but couldn't prove.

- CISA is “working with federal partners to mature a whole-of-government approach” to curbing alleged misinformation and disinformation.
- CISA considered the creation of an anti-misinformation “rapid response team” capable of physically deploying across the United States.
- CISA moved its censorship operation to a CISA-funded non-profit after CISA and the Biden Administration were sued in federal court, implicitly admitting that its censorship activities are unconstitutional.
- CISA wanted to use the same CISA-funded non-profit as its mouthpiece to “avoid the appearance of government propaganda.”
- Members of CISA’s advisory committee agonized that it was “only a matter of time before someone realizes we exist and starts asking about our work.”

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/cisa-staff-report6-26-23.pdf

Imagine waking up everyday having to be @hachi

I'd have to kill myself for being a retarded faggot.

Bruh I can't get over how Jimmy Wales responded to Wuhan Lab Leak as an example of editorial bias on wikipedia by talking about how the Moon isn't made out of cheese for 15 minutes, then never once actually referenced a real life example of anything.

The biases of wikipedia are numerous and constant. It makes sense when you realize wikipedia is really just source laundering for the cathedral. Of course Wuhan Lab Leak is fake until the cathedral changes their tune, then suddenly it's okay. Nothing actually changes, merely the reporting.

The Freedom Convoy wikipedia article is fun because they refuse to call it the Freedom Convoy. The editors have done statistical analysis of how news articles label the Freedom Convoy. It's overwhelmingly called The Freedom Convoy, even among cathedral outlets. Yet, they refuse to call it that. They even had to add a disambiguation note because of the added confusion of not calling it the Freedom Convoy.

The other problem with this mindset is, eventually the logical endgame of it is "only we should be allowed to run a social media site and not you." Which means bye bye fediverse hosting if someone wants to claim you literally are killing people.

@PurpCat@marsey.moe this is what worries me the most about the future of the open web. It won't exist if nobody wants it. The normalization of mass censorship and surveillance has eroded a lot of the foundation needed to foster it. I'm becoming increasingly skeptical that people can creatively out-engineer the apathy (or even hostility) from the public towards the very concept of a free and open web.

@jeffcliff

What's a good GUI framework in 2023?
I'm not picky about the language, but ideally it would be cross-platform and not cancer like election.
I'm currently looking at Tauri