Far from protecting children, Illinois’ HB 5511 will effectively dismantle online anonymity, jeopardize data security, and severely restrict access to constitutionally protected speech for young people and adults alike. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/eff-gov-pritzker-veto-illinois-hb-5511
I love how for years now that console gamers always bring up how they still get physical games while PC gamers only get digital releases now, which is untrue as indie games occasionally get physical releases on PC. Now, PlayStation is going digital only, PC gamers can actually make that argument, even if it's just indie games. As long as computers have some form of removable storage, physical releases will always be possible even if it's very niche.
Also, the whole physical vs digital debate has always seemed like a false dichotomy to me. People say that you always own your copy if it's physical and you never own it if it's digital, but that is entirely untrue. I own all my MP3 files on my MP3 player and no company can take those away from me. I can back them up on multiple devices. And physical media can have DRM and revocable licenses where you can lose ownership at anytime. The real argument should be whether or not the medium in question has DRM, not whether it is physical or digital.
"Meta Loses Bid To Dismiss US States' Claims That Facebook, Instagram Addict Children
They also ruled that Meta failed to comply with federal parental notice and consent requirements for children under 13, 'and granted summary judgement to the states on that issue,' reports Reuters.
In a separate statement, California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the decision a 'critical win' in holding Meta accountable for fueling a mental health crisis among American children. "
Whatever happened to parental responsibility? I mean seriously. If Facebook and all these platforms are a 'health crisis' it's not the platforms that are to blame. This isn't an issue of negligence or foreseeable danger, but a problem any parent can see to whatever degree it's a problem with a given child. It's the parents responsibility to whatever degree any parent(s) feel it's impacting their children in a negative or harmful way to separate that product/service/etc from use by their kid.
It's not the state's responsibility and it's certainly not Facebooks.
Stop using YouTube and Facebook and similar platforms as your babysitter. This is no different than the 90s parents who let their kids watch 'too much' TV and then would blame television for their self-inflicted problems. Don't like what is on TV? Turn the TV off.
I don't like Facebook either, but I don't blame Facebook for my personal problems. I take responsibility for my problems and don't use Facebok (fictional in the sense that I would never use Facebook in the first place so it makes it a bit difficult to be addicted to Facebook, point being if Mastodon was an 'addiction' ... I'd stop using it too!).