California Ban Leaves Open Questions Despite Supposed "Industry Consensus"
"For Linux users and distributions, the bill’s most important part remains unchanged. Its definition of an 'operating system provider' explicitly excludes an entity that distributes an operating system or application under license terms allowing recipients to copy, redistribute, and modify the software."
Not all parts of the Linux kernel are "open source", and some have restrictive licensing or are 'closed'.
If the state enforces the law strictly no mainstream consumer distribution is truly in compliance.
The law doesn't say "primarily open source" or primarily under FOSS terms. And there isn't a single license. You'll find the numerous different licenses under which different components of the "operating system" ship in /usr/share/doc/.
But it's worthy of pointing out that even something like ath9k-htc which supports USB wifi adapters consists of firmware released under three separate licenses. All three in this case are "FOSS", but that's unusual, not the norm.
It's also questionable what constitutes an operating system. Is it just the kernel? Is it the kernel plus the core applications like GNU? Is it the kernel, the graphics stack, printing stack, audio stack, GNU utilities, X server, and package manager?
SteamOS is based on Arch yet it's unclear if SeamOS is included or excluded.
How about Android? Android is a set of software, but most of the apps merely run on top of what is actually an "open source" operating system that is itself a fork of the Linux kernel.
Is Mac OS X exempt because the VERY core of the kernel is released even if nothing else?
"Apple has begun rolling out ads in Apple Maps,"
Open Street Map still ad free!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/
Article: https://archive.ph/ngaBg
Great headline today:
"As Backlash Grows, More Americans Now Oppose Automated Police License Plate Readers Than Support"
"A new survey on police license plate cameras found that 'more Americans oppose these surveillance cameras than support them,'"
It's sad that people still don't understand the dangers of a surveillance state and the threat to freedom AND democracy it posses.
It's not just the cameras, but license plates, drivers licenses, and social security numbers.
The issue isn't credit, loans, or similar. These things can exist without any of these things. Credit existed BEFORE the social security number.
Drivers licenses didn't exist until automobiles and never really had to do with safety. It was bigotry against automobile owners at a time when they were seen as more of a nuisance as most people didn't own an automobile yet. Even after drivers licenses became a thing there weren't written tests or road tests even as recent as the late 1960s in some states.
A social security system can exist independent of it being obligatory or forced at scale.
"REAL ID" was never for genuine security. It was a reaction to 9/11 and yet every one of the 9/11 hijackers would still be allowed to board a plane today. They had drivers licenses and "REAL ID" doesn't prevent a passenger from using a passport or other device so you can't even say it's going to prevent foreigners or similar from hijacking a plane.
License plates aren't a "safety issue" either. Fake plates exist and even if they didn't or license plates weren't required cops can still pull over and arrest drivers.
Drivers licenses are also tools of tyrants. Dangerous driving and most serious accidents are a consequence of bad choices, not incapable drivers.
Option 5 "Responsible Use of Generative AI"