"Assimilationism" is the exact type of "Globalism" shit that right-wing White Nationalist "conspiracy theorist" types rail about non-stop.
It is the destruction of difference. It is the direct negation of "separate, but equal".
Yet they paradoxically say shit like "if you come here, you have to become [insert nationality]" or "why did you come here if you aren't [insert religion]?" etc... etc...
Teddy Roosevelt once said that he was fine with anyone coming to America, as long as they became "American" and discarded any former identity.
Teddy Roosevelt was also a globalist imperialist who wanted a (White) American Empire (even if he was relatively benevolent in its application).
"Assimilationism" is the policy of expansionist supremacist Empire. And, just like with Rome, it plays a major part in the host's downfall. The original citizens grow decadent, self-obsessed and aloof, while the "new citizens" become agitated by obvious lies, discrimination and their use as fodder for never-ending imperialist designs.
https://blog.oup.com/2021/09/an-empire-of-many-colours-race-and-imperialism-in-ancient-rome/
Even the United States military understands this:
This is literally a West Point article.
Assimilationism doesn't work. It doesn't matter how much you try to force it, or gatekeep to achieve it, or gaslight etc...
It will never work, in any field.
Those who want to assimilate are the equivalent of a slave wanting preferential treatment from their masters by turning in "rebellious" (i.e. they are not under the strict control of the master) compatriots. They are Steven, from "Django Unchained". They are cowardly, hypocritical, opportunistic, weak-willed, sadistic, narcissistic, misguided and simple.
Their slavish behavior does not even lead to their master actually treating them better. It just leads to their master being content that they have divided yet another group ("divide and conquer") and prevented people from uniting against them. The assimilationist therefore aids in keeping people in bondage, not freeing them. They end up justifying their own abuse. It's Stockholm Syndrome.
The solution is and arguably has always been integrationism, not assimilationism.
The reason assimilationists hate integration is that it presupposes that they have to treat the "out-group" as equals to the host/majoritiy.
Of course, there's an irony there, because everyone in the West (left and right, top and bottom, "conservative" and "liberal") loves saying "all men are created equal". That's kinda been the whole point of "Western civilization" for hundreds of years (even if it hasn't been properly applied).
So assimilationists are not only Stephen from "Django Unchained", but they are the Pigs from "Animal Farm"; "some animals are more equal than others".
The entire premise of "assimilationism" is rooted in lies and hypocrisy and an ignorance of their own civilizations' founding principles. This is why it fails, and why, the more people try to push it, the worse the situation gets.
Randy Fine says "the streets of Gaza should run red with Palestinian blood" - I sleep
A protester says "Israel is gay" - Real shit
Meanwhile, the Trump-supported "MAGA" Republican who won Florida (by a smaller margin than previous elections) says that anyone who criticizes Israel should get 5 years in jail, of course, this being a direct infringement on the 1st Amendment, the thing that Trump says he is defending.
"You'll get tired of winning!"
loli manifesto
@beardalaxy lol
Nice April Fool's joke. 10/10.
@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net
I'm not saying they can't be MAPs.
It's just that their wider ideology is in conflict with that.
For example, I remember reading an extract by an Italian Fascist journalist who visited Germany during the Weimar era (when they were in the midst of a depression), and he talked about having sex with underage girls and loving it.
I really got to find that piece again, it was crazy. The guy basically said "I love the young German girls" haha.
But again, he was a Fascist.
@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net OK haha
I mean, all of this is "just my opinion, man" haha
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWdd6_ZxX8c&ab_channel=klatica
@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net Neeezi MAPs are a good example of what I mean.
As I said in an earlier discussion, sure, they can support things like lowering AOC, or allowing child-marriage etc... But that is only to fulfil a greater ultra-conservative ideology.
So, on the whole, their ideology does more harm to MAPs and the youth than good.
@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net of course some of their views are agreeable.
The problem comes when you look at them generally, or "on the whole".
Then it becomes apparent that whatever good views they have on sexuality, on "youth-liberation" on "individual rights", on "freedom", that those views are offset by views that are in direct opposition. And those oppositionary views are greater in number.
I think this year will see the rolling back of Anglo-American thought-hegemony.
People will realize that it's all just hypocrisy and lies. There is nothing to it aside from trying to get a one-up on your own brothers. It's not about "liberty", unless that "liberty" was the "liberty to exploit your fellow man for a penny more".
This shit is like the plot of MGSV, except instead of the English language, it's about English thought.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saxI0Zu1ABI&ab_channel=Amitush
It's no surprise that Sargon inevitably devolved into a caricature of "Lockeanism" (which he doesn't even understand).
> Racist, but denies it
> C(r)apitalist. Hates any aspect of socialism
> Wants the British Empire back
> Wants to subjugate others
> LARPs like a great thinker
> Hates the Enlightenment and the ideas of the French Revolution
> Simultaneously claims to be "liberal" or "Classical Liberal"
Fuck, I broke my pledge to make April fools this year just about joking about not being a pedo....
Oh well.
British "liberal" philosophers be like "Ahhhh, Napoleon brought slavery back to Haiti!!!!! Napoleon talked about a "White, European race"!! See?!?!?! He's eeeeeevil!!!!"
Also British "liberals": "The niggers and the Amerindians and the Indians etc... etc... are cockroaches under our boot. We should exploit their labor for our own purposes. Hail the White European Race! This is true "noble" liberalism! The World is ours to play with! We are the master-race!"
The only Brit worth any respect in this regard (for being open and relatively consistent about the true tennents of his philosophy) was Carlyle. He supported slavery and imperialism, was openly racist to a degree that even other racist philosophers were freaked out by him, refused to change or aknowledge that change could be good for society, and generally was a curmudgeon (although a very articulate and witty one).
One of the greatest mistakes of all time was American thinkers siding with the British (their literal enemies only a few decades prior) instead of the French (some of their closest historical allies, and those from whom they drew inspiration for their own revolution).
"“The people had said there was something higher than work, more precious than cotton…it was right, and liberty, and doing justice, and bidding defiance to all wrong.”" - THIS is the difference between materialistic obsession with money/property and true, higher, spiritual, human values.
https://fpif.org/the-lockean-roots-of-white-supremacy-in-the-u-s/
@bulky_nerd@fedi.yesmap.net
British/English philosophers are materialists and utilitarians.
They are obsessed with money and finding the easiest ways of getting more of it.
They are not spiritualists, like the French or Germans.
Marx's critique of Judaism applies to British philosophy.
"What is the worldly religion of the Anglo? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.…. Money is the jealous god of the British Empire, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man – and turns them into commodities…. The bill of exchange is the real god of the Anglo. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange…. The chimerical nationality of the Anglo is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general."
It's no surprise that Marx even thought the way he did. He grew up in a materialist society that lied about its materialist slant. So Marx thought there was nothing wrong with materialism, but the world just needed "real/honest" materialism.
The British created Communism by being liars, essentially.
I don't know man, whatever...