Show newer

@applejack
The problem is that I don't understand...

Not understanding drives me INSANE!!! Why does that faggot believe that discriminating against one group is ok? Why block people so fast?

AAAAAAHHHHH!!!!!!!!

This post had earned me a block today...

I realy have no idea just how much more soft spoken does a person have to be these days...

@Aldo2 @matana @beardalaxy
Stop over-thinking it.
It is the simplest thing possible. If murder/rape/sexual child exploitation is bad, don't do it. Ever. And when you see anyone do it, they deserve to be condemned.

Now, if someone raped a woman, but did it "for a movie", would it revert the damage? no. If you filmed a real murder for an "anti murder movie", would it be ok? NOOO!!! (unless you are
Alec Baldwin of course)

So, how can you defend cuties?

I don't get it... How can lefties always claim empathy, while attacking everyone around them?

@waterdev @schratze @phseiff
I meant to say, that it would be much easier and more honest to just name the groups you don't give a shit about, then name all of the other groups around them.

Hope this explanation helps :blobsmilehappyeyes:

Dezinformacím se konečně věnuje pozornost. To mě těší.

Máme ale roky expertního zázemí a odborných podkladů k tvorbě skutečně kvalitního zákona. Ne lex Putin šitý horkou jehlou k vypnutí pár webů. Prosím.
seznamzpravy.cz/clanek/domaci-

@waterdev @schratze @phseiff
What a long way of saying there is one group you couldn't care less about.

@beardalaxy
The problem here is the same as with death penalty. In case, you find, that there was an error during trial, the consequences are impossible to revert.

Other then that... yeah. It's adequate. Not because it should be "cruel". On the opposite, it is precisely directing the source of the "issue". So I think it's a good punishment.

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.