LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

@alyx
Yeah, literally all political description terms are absolutely fucked though.

@GrungeQueef
What's the catch?

@beardalaxy
Yeah, that's a huge oufff

Destiny: Running around everywhere and fucking everyone is not an evolutionarly benefitial strategy....

That MF is so reterded, he never heard of Genghis Khan,

@alyx
As for fusion, that was an argument for 200+ years in future. And I do believe, that nuclear should be capable of carrying us over for at least that long, even if used exclusively.

@alyx
> Thing is, if we lose enough technology or energy output, we simply won't be able to make us of nuclear material anymore

And my entire premise is, that by the time we start to notice the issue, we will have already switched to nuclear anyway.

There is literally nothing stopping us today from saying "start building now", and have 3 times as many of them 10 years from now.

@alyx
In this case, I meant the anti-woke people. Political language is always a mess, and I personally hate the term conservative itself, since it is based on the left wing view of linear progress.

But.... I really lack the word for people, who want a society to stabilize.

@Nepiant @alyx
Well, no.
Many people do confuse collecting and transferring energy. When you mine coal, you get an amount of energy, that is stored and can be released. You release that energy by burning it, at an ineffective rate. (let's say 50% just for example).

So, when you gather wood, you also have an energy ready for collection. But, if you decide to use it to create charcoal, then transfering that energy will only lead to initial loss of 50% of energy only so you have the remaining amount in a form, that needs 2nd burning to get the energy out with another 50% loss.

This is why vast majority of alternative energy sources are a total scam. Because they steal energy we are already using only to return part of it back later.

@alyx
The idea is solid, but I believe, it is based on a wrong premise.

We have enough nuclear material to obliterate our species. The only reason we aren't using it is, because the chemical power plants are still a lot cheaper in the initial investment stage.

We also have already unlocked the key to fusion energy, and the only issue we're facing is not releasing it, but collecting it in a sustainable way. Global worming is literally us heating up the planet with all the energy we're releasing. And all of that is before AI might allow us the construction of dyson satellites. Yeah, we have insane amounts of cataclysmic problems, but lack of energy is really not one of them.

@lina
Never blame on circumstances bad things, that happened because of a man's decision.

@lina
What?
I love it. It literally is a "non-nigger single mom" investment.

One of the common questions about the current culture wars is, why do conservatives seem to have a decades worth of foresight compared to the left.

Well, obvious question is, that the war is of the leftie agression, but the more complex one is, that they refuse to take a look at their own precedence.

For instance, there is so called laugh test. It says, that no matter what the law says, if it's application is so ridiculous, that the jury will laugh you out of the curt, then it is as good as void. But, is that really so? Because 15 years ago, it was clearly demonstrated, that logical coherence of laws is not important at all thanks to many open discrimination rulings. Here is the problem though. They didn't understand, that they did break the laugh test. So, how do you explain to them, that Trump going balls deep on governmental institutions with no protection is actually quite expected, since ignoring laws and proper procedures was introduced into the common practice more then 15 years ago?

Is it smart to ask a girl out on April fools day? 🤔