beard ひげ @beardalaxy@gameliberty.club

@LukeAlmighty I think it mostly depends on what your definition of "full free speech" is, because free speech as I know it is as I have described. If you are referring to absolute anarchy, then I would say no. Reason being, basically, we live in a society. I don't trust the vast majority of people to have access to something like that and actually treat it with respect.

I'm flying for the first time in 11 years tomorrow and I'm hoping I don't fuck something up lol

@coded_artist wow that's an even more damning statistic than 13/50.

@LukeAlmighty I support the right to freedom of expression. As always, your rights end where someone else's begin. It's our job to make sure that someone's "rights" aren't just some stupid shit based on their country of origin. Speech can in fact do measurable harm that intrudes on someone's rights (life, liberty, pursuit of happiness), so that's where it would stop, naturally.

no matter what your selection is, the opposition will find a way to turn it against you, so i think this answer is probably the best. which makes sense, there is a reason why the founding fathers said the same thing. they didn't just randomly come up with it haphazardly.

drc: 0
lots of snow: 1

@LukeAlmighty SHUT IT DOWN

@IAMAL_PHARIUS it is evidently clear to me that politicians don't seem to care about the people in the country, at best they only care about the country itself and what it can do for them. they don't care who they rule over as long as they rule.

@Economic_Hitman mormons

@flux_the_cat i don't even have to try, that shit is effortless 💅🏻

@flux_the_cat i love to drift my cart around turns lol so fun