@lina @tomie The first person I saw posting frequently on this instance, when I signed up here was Casey Rollins, a black conservative. I was actually surprised that someone like him would be the most frequent poster here. I was also surprised to see a huge chunk of trannies on "freeze peach" instances or instances that would federate with us.
I'd say that I attracted mostly NAS and Liberdon users because COVID and The Great Reset were hot topics around 2020-2021 and we just wanted the shitshow to end. Many of them left when Poast came along because they wouldn't talk about the JQ or they just couldn't find anything to talk about after COVID fell off of most people's radar.
@tomie Fair point, but pre-2021 fedi was such a breath of fresh air. It seemed like there were people of so many different hobbies, political views, etc coexisting. It seemed like what united all of us was the value of decentralization. Of course, the "Mastodon Network" side would block anyone who used "casual ableist language", but I had so many people following me. But I guess it wasn't meant to last.
It pains me when certain groups claim that the Fediverse belongs to them and that their culture IS fedi culture.
Most of you don't even know the history of the fediverse. The Fediverse has been around since 2008 with indenti.ca, using the Laconica protocol. It was pre-culture war, so it was mostly FOSS and general tech enthusiasts. So no, the fediverse was never "Twitter without the Nazis" nor was it "Twitter for Nazis". It wasn't until Mastodon came along in 2016 and brought fediblock culture to the network and the whole thing was splintered. Then, Gab decided to join only to be bullied by anime posters on more laid-back instances. Some Gabbers decided to stay on the Fediverse, and eventually Poast brought more of the far-right/third-position types here, which caused even more division, and the rest is history.
So no, there is no single fedi culture, and if it weren't for the culture war, I'd argue that the fediverse would've stuck to it's more laid-back roots. Granted, there would be less of a reason to join, unless you are a FOSS/decentralization/privacy advocate/enthusiast or just want some cozy alternative to Twitter (the latter was actually the original reason I joined before COVID turned me schizo), but it doesn't change the fact that you don't have the right to claim this place as your own, no matter how big your instance is or how much your sub-culture dominates the network.
@ooignignoktoo @coolboymew They're better as toppings for things like cakes and ice creams, not to be eaten by themselves.
ROFL, this dude thinks green-text is a dog-whistle of some kind! Holy fuck these people are insane.
toot.lgbt went out of their way to scrape this instance in order to issue a #fediblock against it, effectively working as a bad-actor to sabotage the domain.
This is (currently) a single-user instance, the timeline isn't public, and toot.lgbt (plus, all the instances they hang out with) were already blocked via /etc/hosts, meaning federation/communication to/from my server and theirs was impossible---they never saw, nor would have ever seen, any content from this instance (and vice-versa) past the point they were local-host loop-backed via /etc/hosts. Meaning, they purposely went out, and actively sought means of, retrieving content herein (to get upset over and then cry #fediblock).
If this isn't an example of maliciousness then I don't know what is. These Mastodon instances are a terroristic blight upon the Fediverse.
Hey all..
What's the best way to fund a service like #Bandwagon?
I strongly believe that the #Fediverse needs a sustainable funding model to be competitive with BlueSky, Xitter, and Facebook. More than just donations and mutual aid, people should be able to make careers on the Fediverse.
I'm reevaluating how I'll pay for bandwagon.fm in the long term. And I want to make something that's still "free forever"
Do you think there's a place for the #Freemium Fediverse?
@anemone @djsumdog @teratology For-profit health insurance is a symptom, not a problem. You used to be able to voluntarily form clubs and groups in which everyone pitched in and the money would be used to cover the cost if a member was hospitalized. This is no longer legal outside of religious groups.
So health insurance companies will continue to exist for as long as the clubs that I've mentioned are outlawed.
@teratology @djsumdog @anemone
>I do think that STEMlords and tech workers need to seriously grapple with the ethics of their personal choices.
It's tough to do so (especially with the current CS job market), but I generally agree. I like to think John Carmack left Oculus because he was disillusioned with the direction Meta was going with VR with the whole Metaverse thing. Though, I don't know if his current AI startup will be any better.
@mr_penguin
>is this murder or does it fall within the category of 'self defense'
Neither because the entire event was staged.
https://mileswmathis.com/brian.pdf
OK,
I'm not advocating murder, but is this murder or does it fall within the category of 'self defense' (I don't know, I'll leave that up for debate). So this United Healthcare CEO apparently was shot by a disgruntled customer who probably got shafted or someone related. On the bullet casing he had laser inscribed "deny, defend, depose". I'm not sure if he's my hero or someone I should be shaking my head in disgust of. However I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt, and given the inscription my gut is he's someone we should all be looking up to for taking a stand against the wrongs of politicians, mafia created health insurance entitles, and the like.
For those unaware the government(s) of the world have regulated health coverage to a point where I can't gather like minded friends to share the cost in covering my and their health care costs without risk of being persecuted for my beliefs. This is to say it's not insurance, but like-insurance in that it socializes the costs among consenting participants without involvement of a for-profit entity or government. The only entities excluded are ~5-6 religious entities that pre-date some law that have something akin to health insurance, but instead of paying for insurance you pay the costs of the bills of those whom are part of a group. It's way cheaper, but as a person who does not believe in organized religion I'm explicitly excluded. These solutions to health coverage are about half the cost from what I'm told. Prior to the laws of today most people partook in voluntary clubs and groups that would cover these costs. They'd pay in and get health care coverage in return.
Sometimes the best solution is neither in government socialism nor capitalism, but for that we need volunteerism.