Europe's got a new contradiction in law: If big tech doesn't scan for illegal content on their social media platforms they'll get charged with violating the Digital Services Act which mandates scanning. However if they do scan for illegal content they'll be charged with violating EU's 2021 privacy law: The EU Privacy Act.
The question comes up again and again. When prosecutors have no problem prosecuting those they dislike rather than those doing wrong why would anyone bother complying given the costs, burdens, and lost business of doing so?
When your best effort at complying still results in criminal violation due to contradictions in the law it stops making sense to comply.
"The regulatory gap has created uncertainty for big tech companies, because while scanning for harms on their platforms is now illegal, they still remain liable to remove any illegal content hosted on their platforms under a different law, the Digital Services Act. Google, Meta, Snap and Microsoft said they would continue to voluntarily scan their platforms for CSAM, in a joint statement posted on a Google blog. "
This should also be a huge red flag for the rest of society of the dangers of using big tech and mainstream social media platforms. Once you scan for one thing- it's ultimately used for other 'bad' things. This is already true. First it was child porn, but now it's a laundry list of things that are far more questionable.
Idaho Bans Mandatory Digital ID With New Privacy Law
https://reclaimthenet.org/idaho-bans-mandatory-digital-id-with-new-privacy-law?utm_source=fediverse
@SuperDicq Great idea! Buy my game.
@SuperDicq Great idea! Buy my game.
Post about the decline of Bluesky: turns out it's called "left wing Gab" in the article haha
https://archive.fo/r5lCA
"NSA Warning—Reboot Your Internet Router Now"
I thought I'd seen it all. Is this intentional misinformation, idiocy, or more trade war BS?
While I'll give you that in certain instances a reboot may half-resolve the issue where the malware hasn't infected the flash chip itself this certainly won't fix the vulnerability that enabled the infection to happen in the first place. Usually a reboot "solves" the problem where a device has run out of memory and isn't behaving as it should, and similar sorts of issues that have nothing to do with malware. It definitely won't stop or help with swarms of routers running malware and being co-opted into use for botnet related activities.
If this is the advice our government is giving to end users the NSA needs to be disbanded.
The US government has effectively outlawed real solutions by forcing manufacturing to the US. The problem with malicious software on routers has nothing to do with where the devices are manufactured and everything to do with outdated firmware and manufacturers who refuse to fix the bugs in their products. Even if we're going to wrongly assume this is an issue of backdoors the solution isn't brining manufacturing "home". It's random sampling / vetting of the firmware on the routers post-manufacture that US companies are importing haven't been tampered with from the state their firmware was suppose to be. That's literally a matter of hooking up a chip clip to the flash chip and grabbing the firmware from it. Then checking it against a signature and public key of the manufacturer. Of course I'm not sure if any companies are even signing their firmwares. I can only speak to that of which my company does for its routers (ThinkPenguin, Inc). We have signed firmware.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2026/04/09/nsa-warning-reboot-your-internet-router-now/
Added a second boss. This boss is supposed to shoot after a certain number of jumps, but I haven't implemented it yet.
#gamedev #gamedevelopment #indiegamedev #indiedev #indiegames #indie #SDL #cplusplus
Porting Mac OS X to the Nintendo Wii https://bryankeller.github.io/2026/04/08/porting-mac-os-x-nintendo-wii.html
Super Mario Galaxy Movie spoilers
So I might as well give my general thoughts on the movie, but I don't have an overall opinion on the movie as a whole and I'd rather talk about individual moments of the movie.
* Skipping all the way to Galaxy - I think doing a Mario World or Land movie before this one would've been better, but I guess Nintendo doesn't want to spend the next couple of decades churning out Mario movies.
* Yoshi's appearance - I don't like his portrayal because the games establish that he can speak in full sentences (though they have never been fully voiced as far as I know), but he only says his name in the film. He also spent brief time in the "real world", and that is the only part of the film that portrays it. Which is a shame because it also suggests that government agents in the real world are currently hunting any creatures from the Mushroom Kingdom after the first movie.
* Fox McCloud - I think it would have been better if his appearance was unannounced and they made it a surprise cameo. It's out right stated that he is from a different universe. Honestly, he is the most logical choice for a crossover cameo given that he is from a sci-fi franchise and Metroid, F-Zero, and presumably Kirby take place in a version of our future so their appearances would even make less sense. But despite all of that, they missed an opportunity to bring back Tatanga from Super Mario Land, but nobody remembers him (yet the first movie brings back Spike who hasn't been relevant since Wrecking Crew).
* Peach and Rosalina are sisters - This is the twist of the movie and I don't like it. For one, the first movie suggested that she is actually from the real world, being the token human and knowing what "human" means, but she is actually from some dwarf planet with Rosalina and they were the only inhabitants on that small planet, being created directly from stardust.
* Daisy's cameo - Oh yeah, she appears in the post-credits scene, hinting her role in the next movie. I wonder how she is going to be portrayed, given how both Peach and Rosalina are tomboyish in this movie.