xianc78 @xianc78@gameliberty.club

Things aren't looking good for the companies implementing age verification, Roblox just reported:

"As of the end of the first quarter, 51% of global daily active users had completed age verification,"

"Roblox cut its full-year 2026 bookings forecast by roughly $900 million at the midpoint on Thursday, blaming stronger-than-expected headwinds from its mandatory age-verification rollout"

for anyone who wants to play the worst zelda game, you can now play minish cap on pc!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2SiMyWGhQg

okay it's not actually THAT bad, but the kinstone stuff just sucks ass. if there is ever an option to have additional buttons for your gear, play using that, because having the kinstones take up an entire button that can't be remapped is diabolical.

@Spooke @teto
Yay! More gay drama to take the FOSS movement nowhere good!

@Phobos@eientei.org Yes it is really funny. I have no stakes in any of this. I'm just watching.

I'm do not like either Drew Devault, Brodie Robertson or Bryan Lunduke.

All three of them are kinda shitheads really.

But honestly watching these three fight each each other based on their tastes in pornography is fucking hilarious to me.

NEW PODCAST! 🎙☢️🦠

Filmmaker James Patrick discusses his documentary work on technocratic control and the erosion of personal freedoms. The conversation explores a global shift toward totalitarianism driven by the implementation of CBDCs, digital IDs, and the “great taking” of private assets. Patrick argues that recent crises, including the pandemic and agricultural regulations, are tools used by an elite class to destabilize the West and force humanity into a state of neo-feudal dependency. He further examines the “war on fertility” and food supplies, suggesting that these are coordinated efforts to reduce the global population and consolidate power. He also talks about his upcoming film detailing the escalation toward WW3. https://geopoliticsandempire.com/2026/05/04/patrick-ww3-great-reset-taking

🗞 SUBSCRIBE https://geopoliticsandempire.substack.com

⛑ DONATE https://geopoliticsandempire.com/donations

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15788423/Texas-waterpark-Muslim-Epic-waters-Eid.html Taxpayer-funded Texas waterpark announces 'Muslim only' day featuring modest dress and Halal-slaughtered meat

_MASSIVE BREAKING NEWS! ATF ANNOUNCES PRO-2A NEW HUGE POLICIES!_

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBCrg3NhGoo

Utah’s VPN Ban Law Goes Into Effect in Age Verification Escalation

Utah is attempting to cover up the failures of their age verification law by effectively banning VPNs.

https://www.freezenet.ca/utahs-vpn-ban-law-goes-into-effect-in-age-verification-escalation/

#Censorship #News #Privacy #Security #AgeVerification #encryption #law #legislation #US #Utah #VPN

Sometimes I wonder how I ended up in this corner of the internet. I'm not "right wing", or conservative, nor do I care for the edgy Hitlerite larp. Feel as though I have no community anymore. Perhaps I never did.

Lunduke is sperging out over Brodie Robertson defending anime lolis 10 years ago. I guess I needed a reminder that Lunduke is a useless faggot.

It's sad that someone needs to explain the concept of jurisdiction to Utah's legislators and the first amendment:

"Signed by Governor Spencer Cox on March 19, the controversial law establishes that a user is considered to be accessing a website from Utah if they are physically located there, regardless of whether they use a VPN or proxy to mask their IP address."

You can't dictate who must obey your law to those outside your jurisdiction where your law does not apply. This is of Europe which fails to understand this with the GDPR and apparently Utah with this new anti-VPN law. I get that there may be some sites that fall within the scope of Utah's jurisdiction, but it's doubtful many actually do.

Does this not sound to you like they are prohibiting speech explicitly protected by the first amendment? Sure does to me:

"It also prohibits covered websites from sharing instructions on how to use a VPN to bypass age checks."

I will also point out that similar laws in the 1990s were repeatedly struck down that restricted access to pornography online. Requiring identification is NOT constitutional.

In the 1990s, the Supreme Court struck down age-verification requirements for online content in Reno v. ACLU (1997), ruling that they violated the First Amendment by imposing an undue burden on adults' access to legally protected speech. The case challenged the Communications Decency Act (CDA), which criminalized transmitting "indecent" or "patently offensive" material to minors online and allowed a defense based on using age verification like credit card checks.

https://www.tomshardware.com/software/vpn/utah-becomes-first-us-state-to-target-vpn-use-with-age-verification-law

We are incredibly proud to grow our Digital Independence Day internationally:

The website https://di.day is now available in english thanks to @edri.

So please spread the word and help us grow this movement!