@SystemSock @matrix wow you glossed over my pronouns and the part where it says i'm not a MAP! impressive!

@SystemSock @matrix not like it matters in the slightest if i am a MAP though.

@KayFaraday @matrix Wow... you are also illiterate.

@KayFaraday @matrix You wrote in your profile that you are a pedo socially and politically, so a pedo and a pro-pedo advocate/activist.

@SystemSock @matrix

pro-pedo advocate/activist

yes

a pedo

no (again not like it matters)

@KayFaraday @matrix
> Don't advocate for fucking kids
> Pro-pedo activist.
This is your brain on leftism.

Just kill yourself.

@SystemSock @KayFaraday @matrix Nah, not even commies like MAPs.

@waltercool @matrix @SystemSock yeah it's a real problem, and one i'm working to fix

@waltercool @SystemSock @KayFaraday @matrix consider for a moment that hardened killers and utterly evil people will *literally murder* pedophiles in prison.

the monsters in the dark hate kid touchers.

@icedquinn @matrix @waltercool @SystemSock the majority of pedophiles do not commit sexual offenses, and while murdering anyone for any reason is abhorrent, killing someone for an unchosen attraction especially so!

@KayFaraday @icedquinn @matrix @SystemSock I'm super open mind and not necessarily disagree with pedophiles in theory (because philias/phobias might be mental sickness).

Now, if someone, whatever is pedophile/MAP/drunk/high/weirdo attempts something against a real child, it deserves the worst, just like any rapist.

There is an "acceptable age range" formula for that. Anything outside that is super weird at most societies, specially on kids.

If you like kids, then I would strongly suggest to watch toddlercon/shotacon/lolicon instead. Drawn art doesn't harm real humans.

@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @SystemSock yes, most anti-c MAPs would agree with you there

@KayFaraday @waltercool @matrix @SystemSock i don't really care as long as they don't touch actual children.

@icedquinn @matrix @waltercool @SystemSock then be specific: you could say "child abuser" instead of "pedophile" next time, as the latter refers only to an attraction

@KayFaraday @matrix @waltercool @SystemSock what i said was correct. serial killers et all will murder pedophiles in prison.

they have to put them in protective custody.

@KayFaraday @icedquinn @matrix @SystemSock As long it doesn't get touchy or weird like Biden, Hollywood or some Christian priests, it's OK I guess.

I'm also worried about content generation from abuse, but nothing to do on it. Poor Asian/Slavic countries... and France (sex trafficking) are full of pedophilia/rape for money. I neither have answer to fight this kind of abuse.

Understanding you don't relate about "sex", but "attraction". If content generated came from stupid white woman posting their kids at internet, what can I do? 🤷‍♂️

@KayFaraday @icedquinn @matrix @waltercool @SystemSock The reason people hate even non contact pedos is because you’re all like this. You attempt to defend and normalize the attraction, and play these pointless semantics games to defend pedophiles. You are truly some of the most vile and reprehensible people on the planet. Hide behind “I don’t rape kids” all you want, you’re still normalizing it and defending them.

@galena @icedquinn @waltercool @matrix @SystemSock I don't defend any rape! Not sure where that came from. I defend pedophiles as I defend zoos, necrophiles, biastophiles, etc, all paraphiles are okay because all attractions are morally neutral.

@KayFaraday @icedquinn @waltercool @matrix @SystemSock Defending pedophilia inevitably leads to defending child rape.

@galena @icedquinn @waltercool @matrix @SystemSock do you defend zoos?

@KayFaraday @icedquinn @waltercool @matrix @SystemSock No. I hate dog rapists and anyone open about zoophilia tends to be animal abusing scum.

@galena @KayFaraday @SystemSock @icedquinn @matrix @waltercool funny, that's what they said about gay people too

@galena @icedquinn @waltercool @KayFaraday @matrix @SystemSock "Defending heterosexuality inevitably leads to defending rape"

@Dean @galena @icedquinn @KayFaraday @matrix @SystemSock Except heterosexuals or even homosexuals would hang rapists if they can. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-18522383

Childs can’t consent, and that’s a very irrefutable fact.

@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @galena @KayFaraday @SystemSock That's irrelevant, the statement made was incorrect, stating that "defending paedos inevitably leads to defending rape" is equivalent to stating that "defending homosexuality inevitably leads to defending rape".

@waltercool @Dean @KayFaraday @SystemSock @galena @icedquinn @matrix
The in between life regression say that people choose their childhood circumstances before they are born.

@Dean @icedquinn @waltercool @KayFaraday @matrix @SystemSock You're not fooling anyone, baby rapist.

@galena @icedquinn @waltercool @KayFaraday @matrix @SystemSock I'm not a baby rapist, I don't even think babies are hot.

@galena @Dean @KayFaraday @SystemSock @icedquinn @matrix @waltercool

What is it with you people and being obsessed with rape? Is that all you ever think about?

@galena @icedquinn @waltercool @KayFaraday @matrix @SystemSock Child marriage, yes, obviously. You have to be retarded to not think that supporting a light form of something enables versions of it. The problem is that he's being consistent while you aren't.

Tranny flag in name means you're supporting fags who are a higher proportion of child molesters than pedophiles are. Fags are around 40%, but pedos 35%. They're also massive carriers and spreaders of disease, drug abuse, and domestic violence. They're I think about 50% of serial killers. 30% of MTF transsexuals have HIV. You can't dunk one one "degenerate" group and then stand up for actual degenerates

@galena @KayFaraday @SystemSock @icedquinn @matrix It's complicated. I don't believe on strict age restrictions, every person grow up differently.

Now, kids should be kids, teens should be teens, adults should be adults. Understanding kids can't consent or teens aren't legally responsible of their acts, it's because those social rules kinda exists.

If MAPs only means "I like kids, I can't do anything against it", it's fine, be like the Lolicons/Shotacons/Toddlercons and enjoy watching content, but just like them, don't do your perversions on real people.

While watching pictures won't harm anyone in theory, trying something on kids will cause a severe damage on some human.

I don't know any person with "touchy uncle experiences" saying something good about it.

@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @galena @SystemSock there are lots, in fact, and since you mentioned "uncle" i'll restrict it to just men: https://www.ipce.info/host/rivas/boys_men.htm

@KayFaraday @icedquinn @matrix @galena @SystemSock Whats about the negative ones? Do you have a number as well?

@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @galena @SystemSock mm, there are negative ones too, but it's hard to pin down numbers because researchers tend to assume that all such relationships are negative rather than researching that question. hence more research is needed IMO.

@KayFaraday @SystemSock @galena @icedquinn @matrix Because, there are lot of people as well who get in love with rapists. Stockholm syndrome exists because of that.

That doesn't mean rapists are cool guys or a relevant number of positive feedback.

@galena @icedquinn @waltercool @KayFaraday @matrix @SystemSock No, there wasn't any hysteria until it was made up. Largely from nonsense debunked sociology that got pushed into movies. You could marry your 12yo cousin as a 30yo in the 1950s and nobody really cared. Your reality is made up

@KayFaraday @icedquinn @matrix @waltercool @SystemSock The latter also deserves death.

@icedquinn @KayFaraday @SystemSock @matrix @waltercool The problem with this approach is that the non-contact ones will always attempt to normalize it. Every single time. If you give a pedo an inch, they'll stick 5 in your daughter. They'll infest any community that gives them any leeway whatsoever, overrun it, then get it nuked when they inevitably start posting CP.

@galena @icedquinn @waltercool @matrix @SystemSock anti-MAPss have been known to be the ones posting CP, in fact, in the name of protecting children they get sites that support MAPs shut down, which only increases the risk of harm

@galena Can say the same about the politically correct, SJWs, woketards, etc whatever you want to call them. Look how they ruined just about every "geek" industry except anime (so far). @icedquinn @KayFaraday @SystemSock @matrix @waltercool

@galena @icedquinn @KayFaraday @SystemSock @matrix @waltercool
>libertarian
>anti-pedo
>anti-CP
Every time

@galena @icedquinn @waltercool @KayFaraday @matrix @SystemSock You're some washed out degenerate coomer cumbrain faggot that's prancing about holding people to standard. 30% of you have aids and you're a larger share of child molesters than actual pedophiles.

@applejack @galena @icedquinn @KayFaraday @matrix @SystemSock Aaaand that’s how I mute you for being rtard.

@applejack @icedquinn @waltercool @KayFaraday @matrix @SystemSock seethe

@galena @icedquinn @waltercool @KayFaraday @SystemSock @matrix dangle from a rope

@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock

>mental sickness
The historical average was 20+ men marrying 12-16yo girls. Still today: 5 more phallometric studies indicating proportion of men more or equally sexually aroused by children (up to 13 years old) than by adults:
27.7% (Firestone et al. 2000)
14.3% (Marshall et al. 1986)
18.3% (Fedora et al. 1992)
19.4% (Freund et al. 1991)
25% (Seto et al. 2000)
men rated female faces about 13 years old the most attractive: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237004330_Facial_Olfactory_and_Vocal_Cues_to_Female_Reproductive_Value
The BMI men find the most attractive is about 17-20 which is the typical BMI for girls about 13. Women naturally get fatter when they start having babies so a low BMI is another sign of nulliparity and youth.

>There is an "acceptable age range"
An arbitrary one
>at most societies
Citation needed. The idea of not being able to marry a 12yo was absurd in every society just 200 years ago

@applejack @icedquinn @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock
> Citation needed.

That's an easy test, you can try. Go to some big social network, and ask people if they would be OK if you would date a 12yo girl as a 20yo person.

> The idea of not being able to marry a 12yo was absurd in every society just 200 years ago

The world is radically different than 200yo lmao, it's even socially very different than 80yo

@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock White countries are jewed so they care. Nobody else does. You can have a 12yo gf in south america, or asia, or africa, or ME, or whatever, and nobody really cares unless it's to uphold some shittest set by white countries. Japan still allows you to be in a sexual relationship with a 12yo if you can prove that it's real love

>The world is radically different than 200yo lmao
Yes, and that's a bad thing. Natural evolved traditions over arbitrarily modern garbage. There is no good justification for it

@applejack @icedquinn @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock If you are OK with societies where some people have more rights than others because their sex or race… fine.

I’m not, and won’t debate about it.

Being pro-traditions is great, but enforcing a social caste isn’t.

@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock

>than others because their sex or race
Right's don't exist. They're not something worth worrying about because they're not real. Actual people are real, and actual people have evolved histories that you can't ignore for arbitrary concepts. Women evolved to be mothers, men evolved to be providers. Happiness evolved as a driver of function. Thinking anything else makes you retarded

@KayFaraday @icedquinn @matrix @waltercool A hungry wolf is not immoral, but I don't go to sleep while it prowls near.

It may not be their choice, it's also not the child's choice, and I don't care.

Pedophiles get the rope.

@waltercool @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock All of those are dumb, but the idea of being able to prevent someone from consenting is a violation of the NAP. If you think you can coerce them against committing voluntary acts, then you might as well start taxing them for their own good

And feminist (jewish (degenerate)) influence in the first place is the reason it's taboo to marry a 12yo anymore, so blue is dumb too

@applejack @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock Different times, different worlds. We are at times where males and females are considered as equal.

In past, relationships were arranged and made in order to obtain land and power mostly like both examples you provided. Not by attraction and usually managed by parents, very usually women were the kids.

At that time, women were intended as a person to have and raise kids, prepare food and stay in home. Reason why it exists at some middle-east countries.

@waltercool @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock
Yes, exactly. We agree. This is the natural order of things, which modernity crushes because they'd rather have women wageslaving.