Aldo @Aldo2@gameliberty.club
I don't know man, whatever...
Joined Nov 2021
Video obtained from Palestinian medics shows that:
1.) The Red Crescent vans were clearly marked, and all of them had their lights on
2.) Paramedics on the ground all were wearing reflective clothing (denoting that they were civilian medics)
3.) There were no armed Hamas fighters present
Literally every single thing the IDF said about this incident is a lie. The video shows that.
You can clearly hear the cries of the victims at the end.
There was only 1 confirmed survivor.
The IDF drove up to the site, gathered 15 bodies together and then dug a shallow pit and dumped them in it before covering it with a few cm of sand and driving off.
@matrix you follow Richard Spencer's Twitter account, don't you haha
This article is kinda retarded.
>Historically, the American right was better than the left on economics
Uh, no lol
Reagan destroyed the American economy over the long-term.
FDR (Democrat) for example was the guy who birthed the massive "economic boom" that this guy still sips off of. It was the "high IQ C(r)apitalists" of his day who were against him.
> "Trump was elected largely because he was the anti-woke candidate"
DEI policies are better than fake "meritocracy" (which is just Trumpian nepotism), all things considered. And I DON'T have a soft-spot for DEI. And Trump is doing all the "woke" shit x10 (especially with regards to freedom of speech).
> "The goal is to bring about a better world."
The guy who's bashing "MAGA-Communism" for unworkable utopianism wrote that...
> 1975
Why is he focusing on that date rather arbitrarily? Bruh...
"Domestically, Ford (Republican) presided over the worst economy in the four decades since the Great Depression, with growing inflation and a recession."
> Trickle-down economics bullshit that one doesn't even have to get into to say how it's stupid
> We need elites/"long march through the institutions"
Yes and no. Like in the period before the French Revolution, it depends on what these "elites" believe and how strongly they believe in it.
> It will set the stage for a left-wing backlash
This guy is trying to scapegoat Trump for the coming decline of retard "right-wing" globalism even though his "high IQ C(r)apitalist" views are part of the reason why Trump got elected in the first place (failings of C(r)apitalism providing for the ordinary man).
> "Using Trumpian means to undo what Trump did"
So is this guy against Trumpism, or for it?
> Shpeel about "Pax Americana" where America did nothing wrong, ever, and everyone loves America around the world yadda yadda bullshit "rules based order" "free market"
I'm not saying another world hegemon should rise, or that they'd do a better job, but this fucking shit that Cofnas wrote sucks. It's like Gadaffi saying "without me, you will become cavemen", even though he was a "tyrant" himself.
"Right-wingers" love this stupid concept of "freedom", but then tie it with "comfort", which means that it's not actual freedom. It is the "freedom" that is given (not taken) to a slave.
Most of the "dissident right" (even those who you follow) are "paid shills" for one thing or another.
And the most ironic thing is that the more extreme neo-Nazi types end up playing into Israeli hands anyway by declaring that European(ized) Jews are not European (or that Arab(ized) Jews are not Arab etc...) and that they all have to go back to Israel.
Right now, Richard Spencer and the TRS/TDS crew (who used to be united 10 years ago) are in a major fight over this sort of stuff (i.e. answering liberals dabbling in "alt-right" talking points by becoming even more extreme in their racist rhetoric in order to maintain difference).
Remembering that time Claire Lehmann (founder of Quillette) got so angry at me for calling out Quillette's obvious bias for Israel that she blocked me from accessing their page and implied that I was a bot.
I'd been following their page and interacting with Claire for years beforehand.
It's crazy how nowadays there's almost no difference between the "mainstream" "Jordan Peterson" "centrist" "Dark-Enlightenment" "Respectable" people and "Alt-Right" hangers-on.
These posts were made just 2 hours apart.
The "Alt-Right" can no longer call itself "dissident" any more.
> Iran, the UAE, (Assadist) Syria, Hezbollah (allegedly) and Israel (allegedly) being on the same side 
The military situation in Libya makes the war in Syria look like child's play.
No wonder there is no resolution.
The plight of African migrants/refugees in Libya has got to be one of the most horrific developments to occur during the last 10-15 years.
The one interesting thing about this recent development is that the statement came from the "internationally recognized" GNA government, and not Haftar's LNA.
I'm not a "free market"ist. The "free market" can go to hell.
But this new "universal tariffs" plan is just stupid.
Tariffs, by their very nature, are not meant to be applied universally. They are meant to be targetted.
It would have made sense if tariffs were applied to China, and then these were offset by closer trade with Europe.
"Tariffs have been part of U.S. trade policy since the founding, but in the period that tariffs were high, they were consistent and targeted. There is little historical precedent for this sort of rapid experimentation in tariff-setting, where tariffs are declared one day and dropped the next, or applied to all products from a country."
Instead, Trump gave the middle finger to everyone (except North Korea, Afghanistan and Russia -surprise, surprise), which means American losses due to restricting their access to Chinese goods won't be recuperated because no one else will be willing to help because they've been fucking tariffed as well.
Double-irony is that now Asian markets are being forced to get closer to China in response, to protect their own economies. The United States spent literally half a century trying to get these markets to link with the American one. And now all that is in the trash.
Man, Trump is a fucking idiot. Honestly, Biden is more cognicent...
The other day he was talking about "Signalgate" and said that he thought the whole issue was about "phone signal". He fucking said that Baron Trump was a prodigy because he "learned how to switch on his laptop.
@TransgirlA yeah but you guys are probably younger than I am.
It's much easier to find nowadays. There are loli porn groups even on Facebook.
When I was a kid, the first porn I saw was an advert for call girls with big bushes in a crusty magazine hidden in the cistern of a toilet...
"Gotta pump those numbers.......Down......Those are rookie numbers in this racket"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-H1T7ny2Uw&ab_channel=petedogg27
Just a further somewhat related point.
It's funny, because so many Westernized (ironic) "lolicons" (at least on here) complain about "wokeness".
They'll complain about Lord Of The Rings being infiltrated by "wokies", for example.
Yet, in the case of "lolisho", THEY are the "wokies" who have infiltrated a Japanese medium and now demand it accomodate all their moralistic garbage.
THEY are the ones who want to force people to meet THEIR "compliance" (https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2257&context=gjicl) standards.
They can't recognize the irony.
At some point they're going to snap, and demand the equivalent of a dystopian biometric passport scanner.
Ironic lolicons (i.e. Westerners) trying to gatekeep "their" medium (it's not theirs) from minors/MAPs etc... are like porn sites putting the "are you 18 or over?" confirmation on their shit.
Totally impotent.
I remember watching porn when I was like 11 years old.
The Anglo-American control over people's children is such a despicable thing.
Every "online safety law" that's ever been passed is based on Anglo-American Puritan morality.
Every single one.
They go around the world forcing people to adopt their stupid prudish restrictive "sex is the worst thing ever!" customs.
The irony is that "online sex crimes" are rising exponentially, year after year after year after year BECAUSE of this puritanical lunacy.
"A spokesperson for the regulator, Ofcom, said the measures were "encouraging", but added "tech companies will have to do a lot more in the coming months to protect children online"."
Everytime they say "protect children online", you can guarantee that there is some sort of insane restriction coming.
The whole point of "social-gaming" is that you have friends to game with.
Banning them from talking to friends while playing a game is going to push them into more dangerous areas where there aren't such ludicrous restrictions.
Fucking shit, this is so obvious.
Do any of these fucking idiots have children? Do they remember their own childhood? Do they even care about children?
We all know they don't care about children at all. They care more about money and making up new "rules".
I don't know man, whatever...
Joined Nov 2021
