Aldo @Aldo2@gameliberty.club
I don't know man, whatever...
Joined Nov 2021
Aldo
boosted
NazBol GANG!!
And furthermore, neoliberalism/neoconservatism delenda est.
He probably does, as I think he still considers himself of the "Classical Liberal" persuasion.
@LukeAlmighty I think he's a Hapa as well, right?
"Asians are the reserve White people" - Tariq Nasheed
Maybe it's because he's mixed-race, and it doesn't really affect him as much as some might think. That, or the tiny beanie he wears has constricted his head to such a degree that it's shrunk his brain...
@matana yeah, Oman is chill.
I sometimes have dreams that I'm back there with my friends :(
@matana I remember the times when I desperately tried to defend myself from the charges by doing the "I have X friends" or whatever else.
I even once showed a guy photos of me when I was a child living in Oman, or other photos of me with my "diverse" friends (many of which became /pollacks way before I even knew what that was). The response was "those photos are fake" or other stuff that was honestly more insulting and "racist" towards my friends than anything I'd say now.
Of course, nowadays, as I've accepted that no amount of sincere arguing will change their view, I just stick with the "I don't care", or if I really get pissed off then I use the last one.
It's just sad to see people claim that they're "winning" the "culture war" by trapping themselves in the same libshit zeitgeist (equality reigns supreme!!!!) that their enemies use.
You can also see the cognitive dissonance in the "diverse" replies.
There's one that says "I agree, but not all White people". OK, so you agree that all White people but not all White people?
There isn't a "third option" for anyone, regardless of which race or ethnic group you belong to.
There is the straightfoward option, and there is the self-flagellation or self-imposed retardation option.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zPtpRrpU-g&t=14s
"To be White is to be racist". Thereby, to be "anti-racist", one has to naturally be "anti-White".
Most people (with a brain) can recognize the obvious cognitive dissonance there. I.e. "to be anti-racist, one has to be racist".
But I think it has to be stressed, that the time of the "we all bleed red"/"I don't see colour" responses is way behind us.
When presented with the language used in this video, you have two possible options (as a White person):
1.) You end up (like some in the comments have) agreeing with the OP that Whites are racist, and that this is a horrible thing that has to be rectified. Thereby the only way a White person can truly not be racist is to kill themselves or to destroy their own line/people (of course, none of the responses say that, they just say some waffly phrase like "it made me really think". Yeah, it made you think about killing yourself).
2.) You agree with the OP, but for the wrong reasons. We are different; We do "see colour"; We are not all the same, and it would probably be better for everyone if we separated.
I'm sorry to say, but there isn't really a "middle ground" left anymore. This is increasingly the choice you are being left with. And the lolbert response of "I choose not to choose" is not going to help in any way whatsoever, except to just reinforce that lolbertarianism promotes a selfish egotism.
@beardalaxy it is definitely, hands-down, better than living in the shitty.
I was lucky to spend large parts of my childhood in suburban or countryside areas.
@applejack what's even more hilarious about it all is that Steve King is a big Zionist, and yet that wasn't enough to prevent Bon Spiro (also a big "Conservative" thinker and even bigger Zionist) from going after him in the past and calling for him to essentially be removed from office.
All because he linked Western societies to the Europeans who created them, and said that he wasn't a big fan of "diversity".
Western societies are European. End of discussion. Blah blah Japan, blah blah. Fuck off. America basically colonized them after the war. Go talk to an Okinawan about that, and see what their reponse is.
The very fact that people think they can somehow state the opposite, is just despicable. They would rather live in unreality than respect the truth (as unappealing as it may be to them).
"Until we as a society can finally drop all those labels"
I've wisened up to be able to tell that this is ominous, rather than uplifting, language.
It's amazing how the ordinary person doesn't realize their disdain for even an iota of (in this case, imagined) "antisemitism" (and just "racism" in general) does not come from a place of love or whatever, but from a place of fear. They fear consequence. They are afraid. They are forced, through fear, into accepting policy unquestioningly.
They fear saying something, and then the mob coming after them and attacking not only them, but their families; their children. They fear a (pun intended) Biblical response.
How can a group of people be so powerless; so weak, and yet they're able to control a bloodthirsty mob and direct it as they see fit against the slightest infraction?
How are they able to have so much power, that they don't even need to physically direct the mob. The mere thought. The mere thought about a thought. That is enough to make people panic and then recant things that they haven't even said. It's like a CIA blacksite torture session. They'll say anything, anything to get the torture to stop, to make the fear for their life go away.
That is a giant amount of power there. And yet, no one ever talks about that power (for obvious reasons).
How can we have "brotherhood" when the "brother" we have is forcing us to "love" him, essentially under pain of death. That's not a "loving" relationship, that is 100% an abusive one.
I don't know man, whatever...
Joined Nov 2021
