LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

@roboneko @dave @salt @e
> I do not care one bit about the label. semantic arguments are almost never interesting.

I agree. Semantic arguments are almost never interesting.

> It's to make sense of why something should or should not be considered murder.

Semantic arguments are almost never interesting.

@Olmill @hideki
Seems fine to me.

@roboneko @dave @salt @e
I REJECT using inteligence to justify being immoral. Intelligence is a tool, that can be used to many ends. Same as a knife or nuclear fusion.

People with high intelligence can find an excuse for literaly anything, This is, why they tend to hava so many problems with schizophrenia or adictions. Their brain is strong enough to literaly bend the perception to tell you why rules don't apply to you.

If you want a stable and moral society, you should not use argumentation to dismantle moral axioms, because what you will be left with is short term individual profit.

And you cannot build a society on that.

@roboneko @dave @salt @e
I am fucking autistic. I do enjoy overintellectualizing shit to the point of absurdity, but there comes a point, where you just have to say: That's it, I am not moving from this point.

In the exact same way, as even in math there are Axioms that are just not meant to be questioned, I do declare "it's bad to kill babies" to be an axiom of morality.

@roboneko @dave @salt @e
Nice word salad, but you still ended up with phrase "tell me why murder is bad".

And yes, I am dismissing you on the tribal ground. If your question is "why is murder is bad", then you have reached a point, where intellectual conversation is nothing but a blunt tool to excuse degeneracy. And I refuse to play that game.

@noyoushutthefuckupdad @Moon
Can you please send me a note next time a day in advance?

I cannot decide to join at 3AM, without preparations.

@xianc78
Ok... Dies it violate the NAP? Yes. So dies spanking your kid. When you look at a kid as a human being, obviously it breaks NAP.

When you look at a kid as a property, then no. And the kid is kind of a property until it turns 18, and finally gains full rights.

But NAP is not the reason, why killing babies is wrong. There are many things that are wrong without breaking NAP. Drugging yourself till death for example. Or taking debt you don't expect to pay off.

@mcread
A money burner concept.
How many tons per second of fuel would it eat?

Seriously, even if it cost nothing to build this colosal plane, the price of making a plane flight is enormous. Airlines are not even profitable as they already are.

(Did they seriously show a tokamak in the animation? Yeah... Why not just throw in there a power generator, that so far, is barely able to sustain itself at an enormous price... in laboratory conditions)

@stux
That's so awful.