LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

@Pantangelini @furgar
It is...
It literaly is.

If there is any Star Wars fan, I have 2 questions.

1) In how many battles have you seen Star Destroyers
2) What is their total kill count?

Because at this point, that ship has worse K/D then stormtroopers.

You know... The jedi way...
(BTW, can you immagine, if Obi instead responded with: Bro, things got out of hand.. Wanna grab a beer?)

I am so tired of Disney not even trying.

The same scenario. Vader meets an old firend.
Situation one: As soon as Ahsoka realized, that it was anakin, she showed ampathy, and said "I won't leave you. Not this time." You know? EMPATHY??? As a jedi should?

Now, compare that to the dialogue in Kenobi.
Vader faces Kenobi. No agressive action. And he asks "Have you come to kill me Obi-wan"

And Obi-wan responds by lighting up his lightsaber and saying "I'll do what I must".

LIKE A COMPLETE PSYCHOPATH!!!

Disney's treatment of Jedi in last decade literaly switched the roles of Jedi and sith. Why do they make Jedi so eager to murder people?

@matana
Also, I hope your fantasy world ends up well :D

@matana
So?
There are some guys out there that smoke. Ignore them. They are not a good choice.

They chose to start, and didn't choose to quit. Adverts are not the issue there.

@matana
Maybe, if you girls FOR ONCE chose a non-somoker, that wouldn't be an issue.

@matana Do you mean... A western world?

@alyx
God, I wish I will never have to be a company IT guy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42cpEQqf4Js

@roboneko @dave @salt @e
> I do not care one bit about the label. semantic arguments are almost never interesting.

I agree. Semantic arguments are almost never interesting.

> It's to make sense of why something should or should not be considered murder.

Semantic arguments are almost never interesting.

@Olmill @hideki
Seems fine to me.

@roboneko @dave @salt @e
I REJECT using inteligence to justify being immoral. Intelligence is a tool, that can be used to many ends. Same as a knife or nuclear fusion.

People with high intelligence can find an excuse for literaly anything, This is, why they tend to hava so many problems with schizophrenia or adictions. Their brain is strong enough to literaly bend the perception to tell you why rules don't apply to you.

If you want a stable and moral society, you should not use argumentation to dismantle moral axioms, because what you will be left with is short term individual profit.

And you cannot build a society on that.

@roboneko @dave @salt @e
I am fucking autistic. I do enjoy overintellectualizing shit to the point of absurdity, but there comes a point, where you just have to say: That's it, I am not moving from this point.

In the exact same way, as even in math there are Axioms that are just not meant to be questioned, I do declare "it's bad to kill babies" to be an axiom of morality.