beard ひげ @beardalaxy@gameliberty.club

@ChristiJunior wait this is REAL??

@Aldo2 Everybody who posts porn or otherwise sexual content here marks it as sensitive. You can see an example of how to do that in the attached photo.

Hit-Girl is portrayed by Chloe Grace Moretz in live action, but was an existing character beforehand. This is why art of the character is not banned anywhere that loli is allowed. I would argue that posting loli art of Hit-Girl in conjunction with an underage Chloe would intrinsically tie the two together, but I'm trying to be as generous as possible here (for some reason).

I'm not a lawyer, but I believe that some of the things you have posted do not, in fact, fall under proper usage of the First Amendment. I would prefer to err on the side of caution to prevent a potential shutdown of this instance as well as for your own safety. If this isn't something you agree with, as always, you are more than welcome to go to a different instance (or run your own) that would allow you to post such content but obviously at your own risk.

Regardless of the legality of your posts, this instance also has a rule against posting sexualized photos/videos of minors. By posting an innocent photo/video of a minor and using attached text and/or photo edits to sexualize them, you are breaking this rule.

I don't believe that any reasonable person would look at the posts in question and say that they were not created in a sexual manner.

I don't know whether you are playing coy or actually do not know that what you are posting is sexualizing minors, but in either case you need to stop. My suggestion is to just refrain from posting photos/videos of real children and you'll be fine, as that has always been the point of contention. Nobody else has this problem, including users like Jazzy who have been more than willing to correct course when action has been taken against them.

I have said in the past that I appreciate the ability for users on this instance to post about things such as pedophilic desires because of its relation to free speech. This changes as soon as media of actual children is included. Again, you are free to either move to a different instance or make an appeal to @matrix although if the appeal is accepted I will likely move to a different instance because that deviates from my personal ethics.

@Ponpu that was unexpected, but looks great!

@Sugarlespaints i love her expression!

from saba on x:

game game show night!
i like to yell the wrong answer at the screen and then get mad when i'm wrong

🐟5pm est
https://youtube.com/live/FTfViLJqUiY

@Forestofenchantment @veff yeah it would probably be a cat

Lol the $5 smart bulbs I bought from the dollar store are better than the $20 Philips ones.

@BlinkRape "the console doesn't get bricked"
>yes it does
"no it gets banned, there's a difference"
>no there isn't
"bricked is when it literally can't do anything, banned is when you can still do some stuff with it"
>but you can't play your games anymore so it's bricked
"no you still can play your games, you just can't download new ones"
>so it's bricked
"that's literally not what a brick is"
>yes it is

it seems the definition of "bricked console" has changed from being a literal brick that you can't do anything with to getting a console ban and only being able to play physical games or digital ones that were already on the console.

this is how you know how many tourists there are walking around the internet these days, trying to read what is basically a foreign language and just assuming they know what everything is.

wtf are you supposed to call a bricked console now in order to get them to understand the difference? a cooked console?