Show newer

Oh. It turns out that this was just in response to an anonymous spam post that just said "NIGGER BALLS" which got enough people triggered that they had to write this lengthy blog post in response. I kid you not.

invidious.privacyredirect.com/

Show thread

Well it looks like Codeberg is following the footsteps of SourceHut. I mean, I always knew that they would ban people for promoting Nazism, but at least that has a clear definition. "Far-right" is extremely vague and according to the highlighted text in the first image, it seems like they are standing against right-wingers in general. Are they going to ban people for having moderately conservative views, not being against capitalism, being pro-gun, or being into conspiracy theories? Given, that the CEO is also friends with Drew DeVault, this does seem likely.

It seems like this blog post was in response to some harassment campaigns against certain project maintainers, but the final paragraph is extremely vague. It implies that they might purge any "far-right" (or simply "right-wing") user off of their platform. Again, the CEO is friends with Drew DeVault who goes out of his way to eliminate anyone he disagrees with from the FLOSS community, including moderate right-wingers, even if they promote those views off-site.

At this point, it's probably best that you just self-host your projects, if you can.

blog.codeberg.org/we-stay-stro

xianc78 boosted

@apropos @sendpaws
>If open platforms weren't so blatantly harmful to business interests, more platforms would be open and kids would probably be learning to program with little Switch hacks today.

I wish that console manufacturers would at least open their legacy platforms. Atari did that with the Jaguar, but Atari knew that would be their last console (Flashbacks and VCS don't count). Reverse engineering can only get you so far. That's why Dreamcast homebrew is a far cry from official Dreamcast games, as the homebrew games are running on MIL-CDs instead of Sega's proprietary GD-ROMs.

@r000t Can't wait to cheat the system by drinking water in a Mountain Dew bottle!

@georgia @Alex He co-founded Reddit. He deserved everything that happened to him.

@djsumdog @grey @Zergling_man I never cared about bluetooth (I will always prefer auxiliary ports or cassette adapters) and every car I've owned had at least one dead speaker.

xianc78 boosted
You can secure your privacy on modern cars, it just takes work. You can find bypass harnesses on a lot of forums, or plans to make them. You often have to crack open your dash and find the modem.

You can't just pull the fuse because almost every manufacturer wires it in such a way that if you pull the modem fuse, you loose bluetooth and one speaker (used for the on-star shit).

@Zergling_man @grey Kit cars are a thing, but they are made from salvaged parts of old cars. They're even legal if you can get them registered.

@Zergling_man @grey I get your reasoning, but I feel like the "don't buy any new x" is just a band-aid solution as all cars eventually die and given that a lot of people are fed up with the bullshit of new cars, I see used car prices skyrocketing in the coming years.

There truly is an untapped market for dumb cars, but given the heavy regulations in the car industry that prevents any newcomers, I don't see that happening anytime soon.

xianc78 boosted
xianc78 boosted

@Alex To be fair, the generative AI could make something that is heavily inspired but not something that would normally be copyright infringing if done by a human.

My game is using a few AI generated assets (text and backgrounds) and they are too generic to be infringing on anyone's copyright.

Has anyone else noticed that the same people who are criticizing generative AI for "stealing" people's intellectual property are the same people who were claiming that copyright is an outdated concept, years ago?

You can't have it both ways.

xianc78 boosted
shitlibs praise the cia when you try to shut down usaid
shitlibs praise copyright law when you use tech to mock powerful people
shitlibs defend global surveillance when the guy who exposes it also exposes hillary clinton

they are scum
xianc78 boosted
xianc78 boosted

"The data was wrong" is a very convenient euphemism for gaslighting the public.

"What they rarely considered was whether something else might be responsible for the disconnect — whether, for instance, government statistics were fundamentally flawed. What if the numbers supporting the case for broad-based prosperity were themselves misrepresentations? What if, in fact, darker assessments of the economy were more authentically tethered to reality?"

What if people had been saying that for a long time....

xianc78 boosted
xianc78 boosted

@LukeAlmighty Good for me? I'm not black. I'm just saying what I've noticed.

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.