@matana apologize for what?
What insult did I say to you?
What the fuck?
School-shootings?
What?
"The production", jfc. I meant audience members (who pay) saying "we want more pedo content" will lead artists to make, drumroll please, pedo content.
I'm not trying to ruin your day. I'm trying to be respectful.
You're the one who came in insulting me and attacking me, along with Beard calling me essentially a "predator".
Look, if you don't like my post, don't interact with it.
What am I supposed to do or say?
You want me to get a freaking lobotomy, come on.
Also, still no answer on the 3DCG issue...
It's obvious why it's banned on this instance (even though it is considered part of the "lolicon" "craft"), which again, lends to my argument, and not yours.
If 3DCG is "lolicon" but it's banned because it's "too realistic", then, you know, what does that say?
Do you want me to cite the whole post, instead of you just taking 2 words?
Jfc, now you're really pissing me off.
Are you seriously arguing that the lolicon "craft" is not at all about sex with (cartoon) children?
What is it about then? Just some extremely generalized "art"? You know, the other day, a post I made was banned, even though the subject matter is also considered non-sexual "art"...
So you say you don't have those attractions, but then what about the audience who says, I dunno, things like "we want more pedo content" (this is what you get on Japanese artist pages)?
The demand is what drives the production. Not the other way round.
Cool.
That doesn't address my point at all.
You don't speak for all "lolicons". You speak for yourself, as a woman.
"My art is for me"
Well, there you go.
And if you look at the OP, I'm not speaking for "all lolicons" or "all pedophiles". The post was pointing out the hypocrisy and contradictions of many in the "lolicon" community who claim to "represent" lolicons (like you were doing just now, before you said you don't represent anyone).
I'm not trying to push anything onto you, Matana.
I'm simply saying "lolicons" appeal to normies, who hate them and call them pedophiles.
Pedophiles at least have enough self-respect to not lie to themselves.
This is like one big case of projection.
You WANT lolicon to not be about (cartoon) pron of children (even though it is).
So you project onto me and others that we are the ones "infiltrating" a "craft", even though "lolicon" is inherently about sex with (cartoon) children.
You're just mad that, somewhere out there, a pedophile might be jacking off to your cartoons. Clearly.
In fact, if I remember, I think Comi Lo (which Beard boosted today) even publishes (or published) some Nishi Iori stuff. And it isn't only Nishi Iori. Ironashi, Kereno etc...
So that's a double meta-irony right there hahaha
That photo looks like it was taken from some Western neckbeard's Reddit page, jfc.
The people on virtually every "lolicon" site that I visit are open about their attractions. I'm not saying anything I haven't head or seen hundreds of times.
We had a discussion about this once, years ago, Matana, where I brought up Nishi Iori (toddlercon/loli artist) who literally puts "pedo" on all his "characters'" clothing.
You said that when you tried searching him up, you could only find normal hentai. I told you to type in "toddlercon" after the artist name, and you never replied.
Ah, there we go, I'm a criminal, for thought. I'm a thought-criminal. Oh no!!! Anyway...
Yes, great. What a wonderful "free speech" instance, where the "rules" are "interpreted" (you know, like the KGB did) and you can't speak without someone wanting you banned.
@beardalaxy also, just as a joke, you're ignoring 3DCG loli/toddlercon.
But obviously, that's because "it goes too far" for you, isn't it?
And, pray tell, where is "it" going?
"Casually makes jokes about their convictions"
Listen to yourself.
"We can't joke about pedophila guys, because it's not based, and actually, you can only like cartoons, but you can't say they're cartoons of children, even though their Japanese artists say they are cartoons of children made for pedophiles blah blah blah *whine* *whine*"
So now you're saying a minor who is in a relationship with another minor is a "adult child-predator"?
What?
You're the one who said that they support Romeo-Juliet clauses and "close-in age-gap" legislation.
The people in question are even closer in age than my friend and his gf at the time.
You're either an obvious hypocrite, or you're just an idiot.
@beardalaxy you have no idea how cringe that post is...
Imagine being a Japanese loli/toddler artist and seeing that.
Absolute cringe.
You don't own what it is to be a "lolicon". You act like you do, but you don't.
Just like CivNats don't own what it is to be a "nationalist".
"Yeah, I agree with Romeo-Juliet clauses, and I think there should be awareness of minors having sex with each other before the official "AOC". It is normal, and it shouldn't be considered "pedophilic" to say so."
"ZOMGDOAMGOMG!!!!! He had sex with her when he was 16 and she was 11. Clearly that makes him an adult and he's an evil pedo and I love the authorities, send him to jail!!!!"
Some real principle flip-flopping going on. All to appear like the "normies".
"I'm not a racist, I'm a civic nationalist, it's about "culture"!!!"
"Which group made the culture?"
Lolicons are like the retarded "civnats" of pedophilia.
The people they constantly and slavishly appeal to hate them and will never stop calling them pedos, and they're too afraid to be actually based because they so love the mind-prison they made for themselves.
"I'm not a pedophile, I'm a lolicon!!"
"What is the English translation of "lolicon"?"
"N....Wh....N....Not like that!!!!!"
It was a rhetorical question. Can you not tell from the way the question was written? I get that English is probably your second language, but still...
bro, the "anti-'gration" protests are being coordinated by people outside the country who are paid by Israeli interests.
If that isn't "neoliberal" shindiggery, then I don't know what is. They are coordinating that because they want to enact a police state. People like you are "useful idiots" in that regard.
How am I jumping from topic to topic when I'm only talking about one topic, in detail?
Look, I'm going to go, and you can insult me again, if you want.
But this is fucking retarded.
@LukeAlmighty it's crazy how nowhere am I insulting you like you are insulting me.
I'm being respectful, and you're just attacking me.
If you can't even take the slightest criticism, then I think that means you're a pussy?
@LukeAlmighty ffs.....
Whatever, the situation is not going to change. You blaming all Muslims is not going to do shit.
Meh.
@LukeAlmighty bro, it's obvious that your OP was about the rioting in the U.K. come on.
Nowhere else in Europe are there riots right now than in the U.K.
@LukeAlmighty Why am I bringing "Pajeets" into this?
Bruh, the Rotheram abuse scandal was about Pakistanis, not Arabs.
The violence of today was casued in response to a violent attack by an African with Rwandan background.
You keep citing Muslims, and I keep giving you actual facts of the matter, and your response is "you're a feminist".
What?
And I lived in the Middle East, and while I don't want the Middle East to replace Europe, I will say that Oman was a damn sight better a nation than any European shithole.
I don't know man, whatever...