Aldo @Aldo2@gameliberty.club

MPMD has ended the "career" of noted swindler "Liver King"...

....And the only reason it took this long is because he has so many emails to go through that he forgot to check this one from last year...

NATO is admitting that the only thing "uniting" people in prolonging the war in Ukraine is a constant bombardment of alleged war-crimes on the (state-owned) news media. Most likely, this is a set-up (same case in Syria and Libya) so that a "war crime" can be found that motivates Westerners to take drastic actions.

Tail wagging the dog...

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63754799

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63659824

So many questions regarding this report.

1.) Why was it that the media was only being allowed in like 1.5 weeks after the capture to report on it?

You'd think that if there were war crimes, then it would be reported instantaneously for maximum effect.

There were reporters on the ground recently within that time, but they were actually sent away by the Ukrainian government for "disinformation" reasons (btw, these reporters were from CNN - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Px51U_pfOB4&t=631s&ab_channel=TheJimmyDoreShow).

2.) Why is it that there are no photos, contrary to what happened at Bucha.

Is it because at Bucha, the victims were all placed along the side of the road, many outside their houses, all bound, and all wearing white armbands (a sign of Russian sympathies)?

3.) The way the prisoners were treated is eerily similar to how the Ukrainians have been treating their POW's all throughout the conflict.

Things like beating, exposure to cold, being forced to sing the Ukrainian anthem, renounce Russia and the Russian language etc...

There are (or, maybe, were) copiuous amounts of video footage, from 2014/15 all the way up till now, of Ukrainian soldiers doing this.

Could it be that this entire report is actually itself a "disinformation" campaign, or rather, one big projection?

Big Brain (TM) moment...

Remembering that time the FBI did a report on abuses in Gitmo/Ghraib, and they found that prisoners were being draped in the Israeli flag and forced to kneel and listen to heavy metal music, with the approval of the DHS.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGJuGWBJu3c&ab_channel=WarriorPoetSociety

9/11

Nevar forgit <3

Am I the only one that's actually excited for the Tactics Ogre remake?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlueLZrLBj0&ab_channel=VeganDeterioration

Another one of the greatest psyops in history is that being pro-mass migration is a "left-wing" thing.

It's not, actually.

(Mass-)Migration was and is a policy supported by industrialist, urbanite, liberal, right-wing C(r)apitalist elites.

Almost every major Communist or Socialist state in then World had (or still has) very strong immigration controls. And why wouldn't they? Every Socialist knows instinctively that immigration rates are strongly related to wages, employment and standards of living.

Politically, I guess you could say I'm a pissed-off, disaffected, disenfranchised, democrat.

Pic not related.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lTQH_vFaIg&ab_channel=BlackSteelMan

Demoncrats refuse to support a negotiated end to the conflict because it would mean partial agreement with some Republicunts.

Instead, they call for the war to be perpetuated.

Wow, "democracy" is so great.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63394664

Try reading this and telling me that the people writing articles for the BBC (or, more likely, the editors themselves) aren't insane.

4/5 of the people interviewed openly or subtly state that they want immigration curbed; they want people deported, citing this (among other similar crimes) example etc...

The BBC's take?

"The answer, say France's right-wing politicians, is a tougher approach to illegal immigrants.

Their arguments for protecting France's economy and culture, now framed in terms of protecting one little girl."

The extreme irony of the ending as well. She's just some little girl, move along, nothing to see here.

I n s a n e

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63373494

- ______________________________-

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63303438

Interesting that at the end of the article, they try to make you sympathize with the child murderer (and maybe also rapist) by saying that she was a victim of domestic abuse.

Firstly, she was illegally there, so she should have been deported, something they admit the state is apparently incapable of enforcing (thanks, liberal bureaucracy).

Second, they openly state that Algerians (i.e. the group to which the criminal belongs) are the major bloc that takes advantage of the lax enforcement system, in order to remain illegally. That's setting aside the fact that Algerian-French are a population group in metropolitan France that has one of the highest rates of criminality in general, not even relating to immigration status.

Third, the fact that she was abused by her Algerian spouse should be further evidence not to accept people from cultures that promote that.

Instead, we are told that this is starting a "political debate", as if both sides have valid points.

The only side that has a valid point is the side saying "she should have never been allowed here".

Fucking Christ, I hate seeing this shit. Lola will be forgotten in a matter of weeks, just like all the other children murdered by migrants all over Europe.