LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

@Mr_NutterButter
Link pls?

@sickburnbro
> The positive is that you get to make it clear what your rules are.

False. You always could make it clear and change them. But right now, there is no baseline to make basic assumptions from, so you cannot even cross the 1st line of signaling without risking prison.

It is pure chaos.

@eemmaa
So, a perfect start?

@declarer7
To be fair...
Kind? Woman?

When you have to deeply test and write test cases for a single line change of code:

Absolutely briliant

@alyx
Ok... I said that incorrectly.
He might be ok at explaining shit. But his world view is so flat, that you coulddn't walk on it without slipping.

@alyx
Don't worry, I don't watch him much either, but from time to time, the other content dries up, and I give him a quick look.

And he I usually switch after 15 min max, since he's really bad at explaining shit.

@alyx
Do you realize, that I am on Fedi?
What in the world could have possibly brought you to believe, that my neurons could anywhere close to ok?

@alyx
Funny thing is, it might actually be a good tech, if they used a human.

But they used a 3D model with all of the problems, just to be projected on literally almost the same 3D model.

So, it's pointless. You will get no aditional data, except for some slightly nicer fake polygons.

Oh... It's deep fake.
They are using the porn tech on their own games, but with the original model, that they could have used instead anyway.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnozAHKTz9o

HAAAAHAHAHAHAHAH
HAHAAAHAHAAHAHAHAA