@LukeAlmighty @matana closest I can think of off the top of my head is parlando, basically "talk singing." on a sheet of music though it would probably just say "sigh" in italics or something.
@matrix that's been newgrounds for me lately.
@Secftblgirl oh fuck i do not want a picture of that
@Terry kiwifarms is the tippy top of the iceberg as far as degenerate websites cloudflare provides services for
@alyx guitar hero 3 baby
@BlinkRape @alyx just got to the point in the video where he's talking about software helping singers hit notes more precisely (before any pitch correction is even applied). that's kinda' what i'm getting at, if the singer is more precise then the autotune won't sound bad or even noticeable. if you're going for a super clean and precise sound and you can get that, then why not?
that may be part of the reason why i like my live vocals better, though. when i try to record stuff it can sound a little too sterilized for me because i've got the music and the click track going right into my ears and repeating it over and over instead of feeling the natural reverb and everything. i probably wouldn't do as well with an in-ear monitor. although i know when the recorded vocals come out the other end they sound good to pretty much everyone but me and that's probably how it'll always be anyway xD it might even come down to the fact that i play live waaaay more often than i record stuff, so it's not only what i'm used to playing but also what i'm used to hearing and i've just grown a natural preference for it.
@alyx absolutely not, he was a total beast. huge inspiration for me.
@BlinkRape @alyx it definitely can ruin stuff, but if it's used sparingly then it won't, at least not in any super meaningful or even discernible way. the more accurate the vocalist's original performance is, the better the autotune is going to sound as well, which isn't to say that inaccurate vocalists are necessarily bad, but it's just the nature of autotune and how far it can actually be stretched.
that simon and garfunkel example is pretty fucking bad compared to the one note you can only barely tell michael buble has autotuned. it sounds gross and robotic and the audio engineer who did that did horribly.
imo you shouldn't use autotune unless you really have to just to clean some small bits up. which is more "pitch correction" than it is "autotune." again though i don't really care too much as long as it sounds good to listen to and the artist is still good live.
@alyx there's only specific moments that shine through but if you compare this song to chester's vocals in battle symphony that's where i think they have very similar vocal stylings.
@BlinkRape @alyx idk like just have a distinct name for it, kind of weird to have a political podcast and a band with the same exact name run by the same exact person.
there probably is some autotune but you can't polish a turd. most autotune just slightly corrects things and gets it spiffed up for a release that sounds consistent and i'm sure most musicians use it to some degree. a live show is really where you can tell if someone is good without it or not and i actually prefer the way i sound live personally because i feed off the vibe and can't ever get that quite right in recording.
but personally i don't really care if musicians use autotune or whatever as long as it sounds good to listen to. i really only get ticked off when people do shit like lip syncing.
@matrix there's a running joke with one of my roommates that all of his therapists have killed themselves. he's never been to therapy but that's probably what would happen.
@GrungeQueef @Terry @MechaSilvio this is just a list of every single type of person that exists.
@alyx dude is a surprisingly good singer. he actually kind of reminds me of chester bennington a bit.
kinda gay that his band has the same name as his podcast though. like either go with tim pool or something else, not fucking timcast lol.
こんにちは、私はひげさん。はじめまして!