xianc78 @xianc78@gameliberty.club

Re: https://human-emacs.org/

Y'all are stupid motherfuckers. Seriously getting mad at the only project that has a reasonable take on LLM code which is "We will wait until the dust settles" and you fuckers are complaining NOOO YOU HAVE TO PICK A SIDE!!!!!

@xianc78 it's not for the pc port, but there is a mod called Amped Up for the original ROM. it adds an incredible amount of stuff. it even has an experimental 60fps mode.
https://gamebanana.com/mods/613207

Communities still have a voice. Contracts can be challenged. Public officials can be questioned. Policies can be changed.

History is full of ordinary people who decided enough was enough.

Read More: https://thefreethoughtproject.com/government-surveillance/8-ways-to-take-down-flock-without-a-sawzall

#TheFreeThoughtProject

'Like my lover': Chinese users bid farewell to AI companions

https://www.yahoo.com/news/world/articles/lover-chinese-users-bid-farewell-072052371.html

> Chinese users of AI-powered companion bots have bid heart-rending farewells to their virtual buddies as national regulations took effect Wednesday aimed at curbing the risk of emotional dependency.But...
2026_07_16_16_27_05_.jpg

While Americans remain transfixed by the political circus, obsessing over every manufactured outrage and waiting for the next spectacle—the Surveillance State continues its steady march forward.

Read More: https://thefreethoughtproject.com/government-surveillance/while-the-political-circus-distracts-us-flock-builds-the-digital-police-state

#TheFreeThoughtProject

Regarding the suspension of Telegram's domain name:

"The structural reason this happened is not that Identity Digital or DomainME made a poor judgment call. It is that OFAC's civil enforcement operates under a strict-liability standard: US persons and entities with a US nexus face civil penalties for any facilitation of a transaction involving a Specially Designated National, regardless of whether they knew or intended to violate sanctions"

Yea, this law is extremely dangerous and I'd argue it violates the first amendment.

There is a legal concept called prior restraint. It is a legal term for government censorship that blocks information from being published or spoken before it can actually happen. Instead of punishing someone after they say something illegal (like libel or true threats), prior restraint prevents the speech from ever reaching the public. In the United States, it is considered one of the most severe and dangerous violations of the First Amendment.

The US here is preventing the information from reaching the public, not punishing the speakers after the fact. You could go after the speakers on the sanctions list for speech previously published, but stopping speech (which is what domain suspicion does) stops or otherwise hinders that speech from being communicated in the first place.

@matrix
Although, it's always a treat to see, just how right wing the Grok is when compared to the remaining shit.

Don't trust your entire digital life to a remote account.

What is your opinion of FLOCK cameras?

lol taken from the comments section of the video
Our lives are on repeat.

https://x.com/AGDugin/status/2075586373277360520
They're calling it the single most leftist post ever.

Status board for my crap that can check IPv4 and v6:

https://status.sumit.im/

(source: https://forge.sumit.im/djsumdog/6status )

The only reason it drops below 60 fps is because it's debug build+a billion assertions+runtime memory sanitizer+gdb.

Telegram just had its domain suspended. I warned people of the dangers of Telegram, WhatsApp, Signal, and similar platforms, but did anyone listen? Nope.

Telegram was not the worst solution even, but the problem with it is it's a centralized network that demands critical meta data that can and is undoubtedly being used like an ID. Before the government and nutjobs wanted to start demanding everyone ID to 'protect the children' on social media Telegram was already doing it (as was siganl)!

BUT Telegram like Signal has always been at risk of being shutdown or otherwise targeted through other avenues by the authorities. Telegram's founder was pressured to do things like suspend 'terrorist' channels, and did. They shut down libertarian channels too. And if you think your safe your not. They can do the same for 'right wing' and 'left wing' channels just as easily.

I don't know what is behind the suspension ... but I imagine we'll find out soon enough.

For a bit of background France (?maybe on behalf of the US not that it matters much?) kidnapped the founder of Telegram in order to 'gain control' of the platform. The french government claimed Telegram didn't respond when it was in fact that Telegram actually did. They accepted inquires from law enforcement through official channels defined in treaties and international law. The french simply weren't obeying the law and thus not getting a response. Thus their excuse for the kidnapping of the founder was unjustified and actually an attack on free expression as a whole. They didn't want the platform to exist and created a problem to justify demanding it be shutdown or otherwise come under the control of France or whichever power that be wanted it in that country.